Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18071619›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction2008

Pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence: case reports and a review of literature.

Rian Groenen, M Caroline Vos, Christine Willekes, Harry A M Vervest

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Postpartum stress urinary incontinence: lessons from animal models.Expert review of obstetrics & gynecology · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Primary stress urinary incontinence: what to do and why.Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Rian GroenenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Elisabeth Hospital, P.O. Box 90151, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands. riangroenen@hotmail.com
M Caroline Vos
Christine Willekes
Harry A M Vervest
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, the effects of pregnancy and delivery on the development of stress urinary incontinence are described with special emphasis on the obstetrical management in women who wish to become pregnant or are pregnant after a preceding mid-urethral sling procedure. Three case histories and a review of literature are presented. Pregnancy after a preceding incontinence operation is rare and makes it quite difficult to formulate guidelines about delivery when a pregnancy occurs. The best advice is to postpone incontinence surgery until after the last pregnancy. There is evidence that an elective caesarean delivery protects against stress urinary incontinence in case of pregnancy after bladder neck suspension. For mid-urethral sling procedures, this evidence is not available. The presented case reports do not clearly demonstrate that caesarean delivery is necessary in case of pregnancy and delivery after a mid-urethral sling procedure. Furthermore, a second mid-urethral sling operation is a minor procedure compared to a caesarean section, and there is evidence that a second mid-urethral sling operation has the same success rate as the first procedure.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeSuburethral SlingsAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsProsthesis ImplantationUrinary Incontinence, StressUrologic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID18071619
OpenAlexW2035575986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.