ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2008
[A survey of labour pain management in Germany].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SPAM-sub partual analgesia with meptazinol: a prospective cohort study comparing intramuscular with intravenous administration.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Current Practice in Obstetric Anesthesia and Analgesia in Public Hospitals of Greece: A 2016 National SurveyBalkan medical journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn a survey of German hospitals with obstetric units, data on anaesthesia and analgesia in obstetric pain management were collected.
methodsAt each of 918 hospitals with obstetric units, the head of the anaesthetic department received a questionnaire on obstetric pain management.
resultsThe response rate was 47.1%. On average, there were 748+/-407 (median 663;1st/3rd quartiles 309/1,303) births per year and hospital, 69.4% with spontaneous vaginal delivery. Opioids were the systemic analgesics most frequently administered in the delivery rooms. Epidural analgesia (EA) was given to 17.5+/-12.6% of the parturients. The number of deliveries per annum had a significant influence on the frequency of EA (<500 deliveries/year: 12.7%, 500-1000/year: 18.6%, >1,000/year: 21.6%). The preferred local anaesthetics were ropivacaine und bupivacaine. When an opioid was given this was almost always sufentanil. In 16% of the responding hospitals adrenaline was added to the epidural test bolus.
conclusionEA is the mainstream method of relieving labour pains in almost all German hospitals, but is used significantly more often in hospitals with rather high numbers of yearly deliveries than in hospitals in which there are few deliveries per year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18066604What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.