ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2008
[Therapy of mediastinitis in patients with esophageal cancer].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Closing the gap: endoscopic treatment of esophageal anastomotic leakage-a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Article
- Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection.BMC surgery · 2020Article
- [Possibilities and perspectives of hyperspectral imaging in visceral surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Article
- Evaluation of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for the measurement of ischemic conditioning effects of the gastric conduit during esophagectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Surgical Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Defects of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016Article
- [Special aspects of postoperative complications following visceral surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mediastinitis caused by anastomotic leaks is the most severe complication after esophagectomy and the major source of morbidity and mortality. It is characterized by local intrathoracic reactions (mediastinitis) and systemic extrathoracic reactions (sepsis). Consequently the therapeutic concepts are clearly defined. To achieve successful management, early diagnostic work-up is mandatory in every disturbance of the normal postoperative course. This includes direct endoscopic inspection of the anastomosis to evaluate the vitality of the anastomosed organs and the size of the leak. According to location and clinical classifications of the leak, the spectrum of therapeutic options ranges from simple drainage procedures, endoscopic interventions, and stent implantation to reoperation or discontinuity resection. In any case the treatment goals must be immediate and sufficient drainage of the leakage and hindrance of further contamination across the leakage by gastrointestinal content. Also mandatory is the early initiation of supportive systemic strategies according to pathophysiologic principles of sepsis. The fundamental requirements for successful management are therefore aggressive local intervention and application of new concepts in sepsis therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.