Trial reportJournal of endocrinological investigation1991
Biochemical short-term changes produced by hormonal replacement therapy.
Trial report in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hormone replacement therapy increases serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D: A 2-year prospective study.Calcified tissue international · 1994Trial
- Micronutrient bioavailability: concepts, influencing factors, and strategies for improvement.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Free 25(OH)D and the Vitamin D Paradox in African Americans.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2015Article
- Hormone replacement therapy: II. A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its role in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis and ischaemic heart disease.PharmacoEconomics · 1994Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Seventy-one white women within 6 months to 6 years postmenopause were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: (a) placebo, (b) calcium, (c) cyclic estrogen-progestin plus calcium. Calcium was given as calcium carbonate with meals to attain an intake of 1,700 mg daily in the latter two groups. All women received 400 IU of vitamin D daily. Samples were obtained at baseline and after 2 months therapy. The hormonal treatment group had a decline in serum calcium, osteocalcin and urinary hydroxyproline and an increase in levels of calcitonin, parathyroid hormone and calcitriol. The increase in the latter two measurements could have resulted from the drop in serum calcium, it is also possible that the increase in calcitonin levels was a result of calcium supplementation. Although all these changes were statistically significant for the estrogen treatment group when considered alone, analysis of variance including the 3 groups demonstrated significance for the estrogen group for the parameters of skeletal metabolism but not for the changes in the calciotrophic hormones. There was an increase in serum calcium (p = 0.05) in the calcium augmentation group. It would be of interest to determine the effects of higher intakes of calcium in both the calcium and the estrogen treatment groups and to further explore differences in effects on bone remodeling between the two treatment approaches as well as the possibility of a additive effects. Early effects of estrogen replacement reduce bone remodeling whereas calcium supplementation to 1,700 mg per day of Ca CO3 did not appear to affect the parameters of bone remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.