Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18065474›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2008

Locomotive mechanism of Physarum plasmodia based on spatiotemporal analysis of protoplasmic streaming.

Kenji Matsumoto, Seiji Takagi, Toshiyuki Nakagaki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Behavioural changes in slime moulds over time.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Adaptive behaviour and learning in slime moulds: the role of oscillations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fluid flows shaping organism morphology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Self-organized mechano-chemical dynamics in amoeboid locomotion ofJournal of physics D: Applied physics · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Periodic traction in migrating large amoeba of Physarum polycephalum.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenji MatsumotoDepartment of Mathematics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Seiji Takagi
Toshiyuki Nakagaki
Hokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate how an amoeba mechanically moves its own center of gravity using the model organism Physarum plasmodium. Time-dependent velocity fields of protoplasmic streaming over the whole plasmodia were measured with a particle image velocimetry program developed for this work. Combining these data with measurements of the simultaneous movements of the plasmodia revealed a simple physical mechanism of locomotion. The shuttle streaming of the protoplasm was not truly symmetric due to the peristalsis-like movements of the plasmodium. This asymmetry meant that the transport capacity of the stream was not equal in both directions, and a net forward displacement of the center of gravity resulted. The generality of this as a mechanism for amoeboid locomotion is discussed.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell MovementComputer SimulationCytoplasmCytoplasmic StreamingLocomotionPhysarum

Identifiers

PMID18065474
PMCPMC2267142
OpenAlexW2044926131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.