Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18063664›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2008

Accumulation of cytoplasmic calcium, but not apamin-sensitive afterhyperpolarization current, during high frequency firing in rat subthalamic nucleus cells.

Mark Teagarden, Jeremy F Atherton, Mark D Bevan, Charles J Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Oscillators and Oscillations in the Basal Ganglia.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nonequilibrium calcium dynamics regulate the autonomous firing pattern of rat striatal cholinergic interneurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark TeagardenDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Jeremy F Atherton
Mark D Bevan
Charles J Wilson
Northwestern University · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL VISUALIZATION IN BIOINFORMATICSG12RR013646 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI ZHANG, JI · 1998 to 2011
$19.6M
SYNAPTIC CONTROLOF PALLIDAL ACTIVITYP50NS047085 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SURMEIER, DALTON JAMES · 2003 to 2018
$19.2M
NCRR NIH HHS G12 RR013646NCRR NIH HHS RR13646NINDS NIH HHS NS47085NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS047085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The autonomous firing pattern of neurons in the rat subthalamic nucleus (STN) is shaped by action potential afterhyperpolarization currents. One of these is an apamin-sensitive calcium-dependent potassium current (SK). The duration of SK current is usually considered to be limited by the clearance of calcium from the vicinity of the channel. When the cell is driven to fire faster, calcium is expected to accumulate, and this is expected to result in accumulation of calcium-dependent AHP current. We measured the time course of calcium transients in the soma and proximal dendrites of STN neurons during spontaneous firing and their accumulation during driven firing. We compared these to the time course and accumulation of AHP currents using whole-cell and perforated patch recordings. During spontaneous firing, a rise in free cytoplasmic calcium was seen after each action potential, and decayed with a time constant of about 200 ms in the soma, and 80 ms in the dendrites. At rates higher than 10 Hz, calcium transients accumulated as predicted. In addition, there was a slow calcium transient not predicted by summation of action potentials that became more pronounced at high firing frequency. Spike AHP currents were measured in voltage clamp as tail currents after 2 ms voltage pulses that triggered action currents. Apamin-sensitive AHP (SK) current was measured by subtraction of tail currents obtained before and after treatment with apamin. SK current peaked between 10 and 15 ms after an action potential, had a decay time constant of about 30 ms, and showed no accumulation. At frequencies between 5 and 200 spikes s(-1), the maximal SK current remained the same as that evoked by a single action potential. AHP current did not have time to decay between action potentials, so at frequencies above 50 spikes s(-1) the apamin-sensitive current was effectively constant. These results are inconsistent with the view that the decay of SK current is governed by calcium dynamics. They suggest that the calcium is present at the SK channel for a very short time after each action potential, and the current decays at a rate set by the deactivation kinetics of the SK channel. At high rates, repetitive firing was governed by a fast apamin-insensitive AHP current that did not accumulate, but rather showed depression with increases in activation frequency. A slowly accumulating AHP current, also insensitive to apamin, was extremely small at low rates but became significant with higher firing rates.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsApaminCalciumCalcium ChannelsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySmall-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsSubthalamic NucleusTime FactorsApaminCalciumCalcium ChannelsSmall-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels

Identifiers

PMID18063664
PMCPMC2375605
OpenAlexW1592991915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.