ArticleThe Journal of physiology2008
The kinetics of competitive antagonism of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at physiological temperature.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- On the relationship between inhibition and receptor occupancy by nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2021Article
- The Path of an Early Career Physician and Scientist in Cardiac Electrophysiology.Circulation research · 2018Article
- Simulation of the kinetics of neuromuscular block: implications for speed of onset.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2013Article
- Monte Carlo simulation of buffered diffusion into and out of a model synapse.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- Site selectivity of competitive antagonists for the mouse adult muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.Molecular pharmacology · 2009Article
- Synergy between pairs of competitive antagonists at adult human muscle acetylcholine receptors.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Detailed information about the ligand-binding site of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors has emerged from structural and mutagenesis experiments. However, these approaches provide only static images of ligand-receptor interactions. Kinetic measurements of changes in protein function are needed to develop a more dynamic picture. Previously, we measured association and dissociation rate constants for competitive inhibition of current through embryonic muscle acetylcholine receptor channels at 25 degrees C. Little is known about competitive antagonism at physiological temperatures. Here, we performed measurements at 37 degrees C and used thermodynamics to estimate the energetics of antagonism. We used rapid solution exchange protocols to determine equilibrium and kinetics of inhibition of acetylcholine-activated currents in outside-out patches by (+)-tubocurarine, pancuronium and cisatracurium. Kinetic rates as high as 600 s(-1) were resolved by this technique. Binding was primarily enthalpy driven. The 12 degrees C increase in temperature decreased equilibrium antagonist binding by 1.7- to 1.9-fold. In contrast, association and dissociation rate constants increased 1.9- to 6.0-fold. Activation energies for dissociation were 90 +/- 6, 106 +/- 8 and 116 +/- 10 kJ mol(-1) for cisatracurium, (+)-tubocurarine and pancuronium, respectively. The corresponding apparent activation energies for association were 38 +/- 6, 85 +/- 6 and 107 +/- 13 kJ mol(-1). The higher activation energy for association of (+)-tubocurarine and pancuronium compared with cisatracurium is notable. This may arise from either a more superficial binding site for the large antagonist cisatracurium compared to the other ligands, or from a change in receptor conformation upon binding of (+)-tubocurarine and pancuronium but not cisatracurium. Differences in ligand desolvation and ligand conformation are not likely to be important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.