Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18062820›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2007

Changes in sedation management in German intensive care units between 2002 and 2006: a national follow-up survey.

Jörg Martin, Martin Franck, Stefan Sigel, Manfred Weiss, Claudia Spies

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06991777 (Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06991777 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Study: Precision Sedation in Intensive Care Using Neurophysiologic and Respiratory Targets.

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsPrecision sedation in intensive care using neurophysiologic and respiratory targets.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy and safety of ketamine in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a scoping review.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Benefit of Benzodiazepine Reduction: Improving Sedation in Surgical Intensive Care.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Analgesia in intensive care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jörg MartinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Hospital am Eichert, Eichertstrasse 3, 73035 Göppingen, Germany. Joerg.Martin@email.de
Martin Franck
Stefan Sigel
Manfred Weiss
Claudia Spies
Alb Fils Kliniken · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study, conducted in 2006, was to find out whether changes in sedation management in German intensive care units took place in comparison with our survey from 2002.

methodsWe conducted a follow-up survey with a descriptive and comparative cross-sectional multi-center design. A postal survey was sent between January and May 2006, up to four times, to the same 269 hospitals that participated in our first survey in 2002. The same questionnaire as in 2002 was used with a few additional questions.

resultsTwo hundred fourteen (82%) hospitals replied. Sixty-seven percent of the hospitals carried out changes in sedation management since the 2002 survey. Reasons for changes were published literature (46%), national guidelines (29%), and scientific lectures (32%). Sedation protocols (8% versus 52%) and a sedation scale (21% versus 46%) were used significantly more frequently. During sedation periods of up to 24 hours, significantly less midazolam was used (46% versus 35%). In comparison to 2002, sufentanil and epidural analgesia were used much more frequently in all phases of sedation, and fentanyl more rarely. For periods of greater than 72 hours, remifentanil was used more often. A daily sedation break was introduced by 34% of the hospitals, and a pain scale by 21%.

conclusionThe increased implementation of protocols and scoring systems for the measurement of sedation depth and analgesia, a daily sedation break, and the use of more short-acting analgesics and sedatives account for more patient-oriented analgesia and sedation in 2006 compared with 2002.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionDisease ManagementFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsPain MeasurementAnalgesicsHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID18062820
PMCPMC2246220
OpenAlexW2056200049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.