Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18062721›Full record

ReviewDrugs2007

Management of epilepsy during pregnancy.

Dina Battino, Torbjörn Tomson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognosis of Pregnancy in Epileptics in Benin: A Case-Control Study.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Epilepsy drugs and effects on fetal development: Potential mechanisms.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dina BattinoFondazione I R C C S Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy. dbattino@istituto-besta.it
Torbjörn Tomson
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing epilepsy during pregnancy is to balance the maternal and fetal risks associated with uncontrolled seizures against the potential teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A rational approach requires knowledge of such risks as well as an understanding of the effects of pregnancy on seizure control and of gestational effects on AED disposition. Uncontrolled tonic-clonic seizures are potentially hazardous to the mother and, although strict evidence is lacking, are generally also assumed to be more harmful to the fetus than are AEDs. However, infants who have been exposed to AEDs in utero run an increased risk of congenital malformations: approximately twice the rate reported in the general population. Earlier literature has largely failed to demonstrate differences in birth defect rates with different treatment regimens, which can be ascribed mainly to insufficient sample sizes. More recent data have indicated higher malformation rates with exposure to valproic acid compared with some other major AEDs. The teratogenic effects of valproic acid appear to be dose dependent, with higher risks at dosage levels >1000 mg/day. Polytherapy involving treatment with more than one AED also seems to be associated with an increased risk of birth defects compared with monotherapy. Recently, a few small-scale studies have investigated the possibility that exposure to AEDs in utero may adversely affect the postnatal cognitive development of the offspring. Some of these studies have suggested that valproic acid poses a higher risk compared with other AEDs in this respect. These signals are important, but must be interpreted with caution because of the methodological shortcomings of the studies and because adequately powered prospective studies are necessary to draw firm conclusions. More reassuring findings have emerged regarding the obstetric outcome of pregnancy and the risk of worsening of epilepsy during pregnancy. In particular, it seems that the risk of obstetric complications is not significantly increased. Furthermore, most of the women with epilepsy have no change in their seizure frequency during pregnancy. The disposition of many AEDs may change during pregnancy, reflected in declining plasma drug concentrations. This seems to be most pronounced for lamotrigine and possibly also for oxcarbazepine, and can result in break-through seizures. The common treatment strategy has been to use the appropriate AED for the woman's seizure disorder as monotherapy in the lowest effective dosage throughout pregnancy, the objective being to use AEDs in such a way that generalised tonic-clonic seizures are avoided but with minimised risks to the fetus, the newborn and the breast-fed infant. Valproic acid should be avoided if possible. Any major change in the treatment of a woman with epilepsy should ideally be completed before conception. Regular monitoring of drug concentrations is recommended during pregnancy, in particular for lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAnticonvulsantsEpilepsyFemaleHumansInfantPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRisk FactorsAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID18062721
OpenAlexW1977630796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.