Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18061846›Full record

ReviewSeminars in nephrology2007

Proteomics for biomarker discovery in acute kidney injury.

Prasad Devarajan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in nephrology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation of renal function in rats with moderate and mild brain trauma.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Biomarkers and updates on pediatrics lupus nephritis.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2013
    Review
  15. Proteomics and metabolomics in renal transplantation-quo vadis?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2013
    Review
  16. Marking renal injury: can we move beyond serum creatinine?Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2012
    Review
  17. Systems biology of kidney diseases.Kidney international · 2012
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Biomarker discovery and development in pediatric critical care medicine.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Prasad DevarajanCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. prasad.devarajan@cchmc.org

Funding

Implications of the ASK1/JNK pathway in ARFR01DK069749 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI DEVARAJAN, PRASAD · 2005 to 2009
$1.6M
ANKYRIN: CRUCIAL LINKER IN RENAL CELL APOPTOTIC CASCADESR01DK053289 · NIDDK · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI DEVARAJAN, PRASAD · 2000 to 2003
$674k
NGAL: A novel early biomarker of acute renal injuryR21DK070163 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MED CTR (CINCINNATI) · PI DEVARAJAN, PRASAD · 2004 to 2005
$410k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK053289NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069749NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK53289NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK070163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI), previously referred to as acute renal failure, represents a common and devastating problem in clinical medicine. Despite significant improvements in therapeutics, the mortality and morbidity associated with AKI remain high. A major reason for this is the lack of early markers for AKI, and hence an unacceptable delay in initiating therapy. Fortunately, the application of innovative technologies such as functional genomics and proteomics to human and animal models of AKI has uncovered several novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The most promising of these are chronicled in this review. These include the identification of biomarker panels in plasma (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and cystatin C) and urine (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, kidney injury molecule-1, interleukin-18, cystatin C, alpha1-microglobulin, Fetuin-A, Gro-alpha, and meprin). It is likely that the AKI panels will be useful for timing the initial insult, and assessing the duration and severity of AKI. It is also probable that the AKI panels will distinguish between the various etiologies of AKI and predict clinical outcomes. It will be important in future studies to validate the sensitivity and specificity of these biomarker panels in clinical samples from large cohorts and from multiple clinical situations. Such studies will be facilitated markedly by the development of commercial tools for the reproducible measurement of biomarkers across different laboratories.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAcute-Phase ProteinsBiomarkersGene Expression ProfilingHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1HumansLipocalin-2LipocalinsMembrane GlycoproteinsProteomicsProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptors, VirusSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAcute-Phase ProteinsBiomarkersHAVCR1 protein, humanHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1LCN2 protein, humanLipocalin-2LipocalinsMembrane GlycoproteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID18061846
PMCPMC2174578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.