Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18059423›Full record

Trial reportJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2008

Allergen levels in inner city homes: baseline concentrations and evaluation of intervention effectiveness.

John L Adgate, Gurumurthy Ramachandran, Sook Ja Cho, Andrew D Ryan, Jason Grengs

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  2. The Impact of the Indoor Environment on Childhood Asthma.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Home Environments in Allergic Disease.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Asthma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2015
    Review
  9. Dust Allergens within Rural Northern Rocky Mountain Residences.Jacobs journal of allergy and immunology · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Performance of dust allergen carpet samplers in controlled laboratory studies.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2013
    Article
  14. Fungal pollution of indoor environments and its management.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2012
    Article
  15. The role of indoor allergens in the development of asthma.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John L AdgateDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnessota, USA. jadgate@umn.edu
Gurumurthy Ramachandran
Sook Ja Cho
Andrew D Ryan
Jason Grengs
Center for Environmental Health · USUniversity of Minnesota · USTwin Cities Orthopedics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allergens in house dust are risk factors for asthma causation and exacerbation, and asthma interventions often focus on exposure reduction using methods that may not be sustainable over time in low-income communities. A randomized controlled trial with up to six home visits was used to evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions focused on reducing dust loading and allergen concentrations in 47 low-income inner-city households in Minneapolis, MN. The interventions, which included education and relatively inexpensive cleaning procedures, were developed using a community-based participatory consultation process with focus groups held in English, Somali, and Spanish to incorporate community feedback from participants into protocols and study design decisions. Change in levels of cat, cockroach, dust mite, and culturable fungi as well as overall dust loading were evaluated by measuring the difference in concentrations before and after the cleaning intervention, and mixed models were used to assess the effect of education and cleaning on baseline allergen levels during the final three home visits. The cleaning intervention significantly lowered dust loading in all households and culturable fungi levels in single family homes, reduced cat allergen concentrations in homes with cats, but had no significant effect on cockroach allergen levels. The cleaning intervention also modestly decreased the frequency of observed allergen concentrations above suggested health benchmarks for cat, cockroach, and fungi. The cleaning and education interventions had similar effects on baseline allergen levels measured during subsequent home visits; both interventions significantly reduced baseline levels of cat and fungal allergens observed in pre-cleaning samples, but had no significant effect on cockroach allergen levels. Overall, the cleaning intervention modestly reduced potential exposure to risk factors associated with asthma mortality and morbidity in a way that can be implemented by most homeowners or renters, independent of education, income, or the ability to speak English.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorAllergensAnimalsAntigens, DermatophagoidesCatsCommunity ParticipationDustEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFocus GroupsFungiGlycoproteinsHealth EducationHousehold WorkHousingHumansMinnesotaAllergensAntigens, DermatophagoidesDustFel d 1 protein, Felis domesticusGlycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID18059423
OpenAlexW1968465058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.