Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18059269›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2008

Germline rates of de novo meiotic deletions and duplications causing several genomic disorders.

Daniel J Turner, Marcos Miretti, Diana Rajan, Heike Fiegler, Nigel P Carter, Martyn L Blayney, Stephan Beck, Matthew E Hurles

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 331 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Distinct mechanisms of CNV formation at the human 15q13.3 locus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mapping copy number variable regions correlated with reproduction and production traits in Karan Fries cattle mammalian genomics.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Analytical Validation of a Genomic Newborn Screening Workflow.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chromosomal Instability and Chromoanagenesis as Forces for Genomic Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  16. The Evolutionary Potential of Chromoanagenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J TurnerWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
Marcos Miretti
Diana Rajan
Heike Fiegler
Nigel P Carter
Martyn L Blayney
Stephan Beck
Matthew E Hurles
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBBourn Hall Clinic · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 077008Wellcome Trust 077014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination between highly similar duplicated sequences (nonallelic homologous recombination, NAHR) generates deletions, duplications, inversions and translocations, and it is responsible for genetic diseases known as 'genomic disorders', most of which are caused by altered copy number of dosage-sensitive genes. NAHR hot spots have been identified within some duplicated sequences. We have developed sperm-based assays to measure the de novo rate of reciprocal deletions and duplications at four NAHR hot spots. We used these assays to dissect the relative rates of NAHR between different pairs of duplicated sequences. We show that (i) these NAHR hot spots are specific to meiosis, (ii) deletions are generated at a higher rate than their reciprocal duplications in the male germline and (iii) some of these genomic disorders are likely to have been underascertained clinically, most notably that resulting from the duplication of 7q11, the reciprocal of the deletion causing Williams-Beuren syndrome.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionGene DuplicationMeiosisChromosomes, Human, Pair 7HumansMaleMolecular Sequence DataRecombination, GeneticSpermatozoaWilliams Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID18059269
PMCPMC2669897
OpenAlexW2042482078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.