Trial reportPediatric cardiology2008
Comparison of the effectiveness of oral sildenafil versus oxygen administration as a test for feasibility of operation for patients with secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Trial report in Pediatric cardiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of sildenafil in infants*.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2014Review
- Current practices in the use of sildenafil for pulmonary arterial hypertension in Brazilian hospitals.BMC research notes · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is shown that phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors such as sildenafil can modulate pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) via increasing the level of guanosine-3,5-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) and decreases pulmonary artery pressure (PAP). In this study we determined the effectiveness of sildenafil and compared its efficacy with inhaled nasal oxygen (O2) during cardiac catheterization in patients with congenital heart diseases (CHD) and PAH, as a test of feasibility for surgical repair of the patients. We studied 15 patients, 9 male and 6 female, with a mean age of 8.3 years. Hemodynamic measurements were made at baseline, after O2 administration for 20 min (5 L/min by mask), and then 45 min after administration of a single dose of sildenafil (0.5 mg/kg orally or via nasogastric tube). Mean PAP at baseline was 72.2 +/- 12.54 mm Hg and was reduced by sildenafil to 52.5 +/- 9.6 and by O2 to 61.3 +/- 10.39. Both sildenafil and O2 decreased PAP effectively (p = 0.08 and p = 0.04, respectively). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated for 12 patients, with a baseline level of 9.08 +/- 1.09 mm Hg . L(-1) . min, which was significantly decreased by O2, to 3.74 +/- 0.43, and by sildenafil, to 5.93 +/- 0.75 (p = 0.005 and p = 0.05, respectively). Sildenafil, as a single oral dose, can effectively reduce PAP and PVR. This novel PDE5 inhibitor can be used for assessment of feasibility of operation for patients with CHD and PAH when inhaled NO is not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.