Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18057171›Full record

ReviewPostgraduate medical journal2007

Liver disease in erythropoietic protoporphyria: insights and implications for management.

A V Anstey, R J Hift

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postgraduate medical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Erythropoietic protoporphyrias: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Roles of the ABCG2 Transporter in Protoporphyrin IX Distribution and Toxicity.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2024
    Review
  8. CRISPR/Cas9-MediatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Protoporphyrin IX: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A V AnsteyRoyal Gwent Hospital, Cardiff Road, Newport, Gwent NP20 2UB, UK. alex.anstey@gwent.wales.nhs.uk
R J Hift

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Protoporphyria, ErythropoieticAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansLiver DiseasesLiver TransplantationPedigreeProtoporphyrinsprotoporphyrin IXProtoporphyrins

Identifiers

PMID18057171
PMCPMC2750922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.