Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18056742›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008

Influences on older people's decision making regarding choice of topical or oral NSAIDs for knee pain: qualitative study.

Dawn Carnes, Yasir Anwer, Martin Underwood, Geoff Harding, Suzanne Parsons, TOIB study team

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Physiotherapy management of knee osteoarthritis in Nigeria-A survey of self-reported treatment preferences.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2017
    Article
  7. Understanding the use of over-the-counter pain treatments in adolescents with chronic pain.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and initial evaluation of a treatment decision dashboard.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Osteoarthritis of the knee in primary care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn CarnesCentre for Health Sciences, Barts and The London, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT.
Yasir Anwer
Martin Underwood
Geoff Harding
Suzanne Parsons
TOIB study team
Queen Mary University of London · GBPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GB

Funding

Department of Health 01/09/02Medical Research Council MC_U122785831Medical Research Council MC_U122797165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the factors that influence older people's decision making regarding use of topical or oral ibuprofen for their knee pain.

designQualitative interview study nested within a randomised controlled trial and a patient preference study that compared advice to use oral or topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for knee pain in older people.

setting11 general practices.

participants30 people aged > or =50 with knee pain.

resultsParticipants' decision making was influenced by their perceptions of the associated risk of adverse effects, presence of other illness, nature of their pain, advice received, and practicality. Although participants' understanding of how the medications worked was sometimes poor their decision making about the use of NSAIDs seemed logical and appropriate. Participants' model for treatment was to use topical NSAIDs for mild, local, and transient pain and oral NSAIDs for moderate to severe, generalised, and constant pain (in the absence of other more serious illness or risk of adverse effects). Participants showed marked tolerance and normalisation of adverse effects.

conclusionParticipants had clear ideas about the appropriate use of oral and topical NSAIDs. Taking such views into account when prescribing may improve adherence, judgment of efficacy, and the doctor-patient relationship. Tolerance and normalisation of adverse effects in these patients indicate that closer monitoring of older people who use NSAIDs might be needed.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorAdministration, OralAdministration, TopicalAgedAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAttitude to HealthHumansIbuprofenKneeMiddle AgedPainPerceptionPilot ProjectsRisk AssessmentAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIbuprofen

Identifiers

PMID18056742
PMCPMC2206263
OpenAlexW2033862241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.