Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18055391›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2008

Symbiont-mediated protection.

Eleanor R Haine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A bacterial symbiont and a plant virus enhance insect fitness by inducing physical defenses against fungal parasites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trophic niche partitioning in giant clams.Communications biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The endosymbiontmBio · 2024
    Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Effect ofInsects · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Characterization ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eleanor R HaineDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. e.haine@sheffield.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the fact that all vertically transmitted symbionts sequester resources from their hosts and are therefore costly to maintain, there is an extraordinary diversity of them in invertebrates. Some spread through host populations by providing their hosts with fitness benefits or by manipulating host sex ratio, but some do not: their maintenance in host lineages remains an enigma. In this review, I explore the evolutionary ecology of vertically transmitted symbionts and their impact on host resistance, and provide an overview of the evidence for the three-way interactions between these symbionts, natural enemies and invertebrate hosts. A number of recent empirical and theoretical studies suggest that vertically transmitted symbionts may protect their hosts from pathogens. If this 'symbiont-mediated protection' is widespread, it is likely that vertically transmitted symbionts contribute significantly to variation in measures of invertebrate resistance to natural enemies.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsHost-Parasite InteractionsInvertebratesPopulation DynamicsSpecies SpecificitySymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID18055391
PMCPMC2213712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.