Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18054817›Full record

ArticleVaccine2008

Markedly enhanced immunogenicity of a Pfs25 DNA-based malaria transmission-blocking vaccine by in vivo electroporation.

Ralph LeBlanc, Yessika Vasquez, Drew Hannaman, Nirbhay Kumar

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Engineering of tetanus toxoid-loaded polymeric microneedle patches.Drug delivery and translational research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Electroporation-mediated gene delivery.Advances in genetics · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tolerability of two sequential electroporation treatments using MedPulser DNA delivery system (DDS) in healthy adults.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ralph LeBlancJohns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Yessika Vasquez
Drew Hannaman
Nirbhay Kumar
Johns Hopkins University · USIchor Medical Systems (United States) · US

Funding

ZINC AND CA EDTA THERAPY OF PLUMBISMM01RR000052 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FLEXNER, CHARLES W. · 1985 to 2007
$37.3M
A DNA VACCINE TO PREVENT TRANSMISSION OF HUMAN MALARIAR01AI047089 · NIAID · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI KUMAR, NIRBHAY · 2000 to 2011
$3.6M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000052NCRR NIH HHS RR00052NIAID NIH HHS 2R01AI47089-05A2NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI047089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pfs25 is a promising target antigen for the development of a malaria transmission-blocking vaccine and prior research has demonstrated induction of high and functionally effective antibodies in mice with IM injection of Pfs25 encoding DNA plasmid. Likewise, Pfs25 DNA vaccine was immunogenic in rhesus macaques but required a protein boost to elicit significant transmission-blocking antibodies. The translation of these encouraging findings to human clinical trials has been impeded largely by the relatively poor immunogenicity of DNA plasmids in larger animals. In vivo electroporation (EP) has revealed significant enhancement of the potency of DNA plasmids. The results reported here compared the immunogenicity and functional transmission-blocking effects of immunization with DNA plasmid (25 microg) by the traditional IM route compared to coupling the IM injection (0.25, 2.5 and 25 microg doses) with in vivo EP. Significantly, a 0.25 microg dose of DNA plasmid, when administered with EP, induced antibody titers (1:160,000) and functional transmission-blocking effects that were equivalent to those achieved by a one hundred fold higher (25 microg) dose of DNA plasmid given without EP. At a 25.0 microg DNA dose with or without EP there was sufficient antigenic stimulation to result in effective antibody titers; however EP method yielded antibody titer of 1:1,280,000 as compared to only 1:160,000 titer without EP. This observed two log reduction in the amount of DNA plasmid required to induce significant transmission-blocking effects makes a compelling argument in favor of further evaluation of DNA vaccines by in vivo EP method in larger animals. Further experiments in non-human primates and eventually in phase I human trials will determine if the use of EP will induce effective and sustained malaria transmission-blocking effects at acceptable doses of plasmid DNA.

Indexed as

ElectroporationAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntibody AffinityCulicidaeEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleImmunoglobulin GInjections, IntramuscularMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CParasitemiaPlasmidsProtozoan ProteinsAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GMalaria VaccinesPfs25 protein, Plasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID18054817
PMCPMC2225989
OpenAlexW2060917021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.