Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18054084›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2008

Bootstrap significance of low SNR evoked response.

J McCubbin, T Yee, J Vrba, S E Robinson, P Murphy, H Eswaran, H Preissl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation of the flash-evoked response from fetal MEG.Physics in medicine and biology · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J McCubbinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. mccubbin@telus.net <mccubbin@telus.net>
T Yee
J Vrba
S E Robinson
P Murphy
H Eswaran
H Preissl

Funding

FETAL MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND EVOKED POTENTIALSR01NS036277 · NINDS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI LOWERY, CURTIS L · 1998 to 2011
$7.0M
Temporal-Spatial Biomagnetic Fields of the FetusR33EB000978 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MED SCIS LTL ROCK · PI LOWERY, CURTIS L · 2002 to 2004
$1.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS 1R33EB00978-01NIBIB NIH HHS R33 EB000978NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS367704A1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to obtain adequate signal to noise ratio (SNR), stimulus-evoked brain signals are averaged over a large number of trials. However, in certain applications, e.g. fetal magnetoencephalography (MEG), this approach fails due to underlying conditions (inherently small signals, non-stationary/poorly characterized signals, or limited number of trials). The resulting low SNR makes it difficult to reliably identify a response by visual examination of the averaged time course, even after pre-processing to attenuate interference. The purpose of this work was to devise an intuitive statistical significance test for low SNR situations, based on non-parametric bootstrap resampling. We compared a two-parameter measure of p-value and statistical power with a bootstrap equal means test and a traditional rank test using fetal MEG data collected with a light flash stimulus. We found that the two-parameter measure generally agreed with established measures, while p-value alone was overly optimistic. In an extension of our approach, we compared methods to estimate the background noise. A method based on surrogate averages resulted in the most robust estimate. In summary we have developed a flexible and intuitively satisfying bootstrap-based significance measure incorporating appropriate noise estimation.

Indexed as

Brain MappingNoiseBrainComputer SimulationEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFetusHumansMagnetoencephalographyModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID18054084
PMCPMC2324207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.