Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18053699›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2007

Mechanisms to control rereplication and implications for cancer.

Sara S Hook, Jie Jessie Lin, Anindya Dutta

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CRL4Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  10. Mechanistic insights into KDM4A driven genomic instability.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Polyteny: still a giant player in chromosome research.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara S HookDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. hook@virginia.edu
Jie Jessie Lin
Anindya Dutta
University of Virginia · US

Funding

The role of MCM8-9 in genomic instability of cancersR01CA060499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Anindya Dutta · 1994 to 2026
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA60499NCI NIH HHS R01 CA060499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in the replication field have highlighted how the replication initiator proteins are negatively regulated by inhibitor proteins and ubiquitin-mediated degradation in mammalian cells to prevent rereplication. When these regulatory pathways go awry, uncontrolled rereplication ensues and a G2/M checkpoint is evoked to prevent cellular death. Many components of the checkpoints activated by rereplicaton are important for cancer prevention by facilitating DNA damage repair processes. The pathways that prevent rereplication themselves have also recently been implicated in preventing tumorigenesis. Studies from patient tumors, genetically altered mice, and mammalian cell culture suggest that deregulation of replication licensing proteins results in an increase in aneuploidy, chromosomal fusions, and DNA breaks. These studies provide a framework to address how regulators of replication function to maintain genomic stability.

Indexed as

Cell CycleDNA ReplicationAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsHumansNeoplasmsCell Cycle Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18053699
PMCPMC2174913
OpenAlexW2055418357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.