Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18053163›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2007

Functional annotation of 19,841 Populus nigra full-length enriched cDNA clones.

Tokihiko Nanjo, Tetsuya Sakurai, Yasushi Totoki, Atsushi Toyoda, Mitsuru Nishiguchi, Tomoyuki Kado, Tomohiro Igasaki, Norihiro Futamura, Motoaki Seki, Yoshiyuki Sakaki and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ppdb: plant promoter database version 3.0.Nucleic acids research · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tokihiko NanjoDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8687 JAPAN. nanjo@affrc.go.jp
Tetsuya Sakurai
Yasushi Totoki
Atsushi Toyoda
Mitsuru Nishiguchi
Tomoyuki Kado
Tomohiro Igasaki
Norihiro Futamura
Motoaki Seki
Yoshiyuki Sakaki
Kazuo Shinozaki
Kenji Shinohara

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulus is one of favorable model plants because of its small genome. Structural genomics of Populus has reached a breakpoint as nucleotides of the entire genome have been determined. Reaching the post genome era, functional genomics of Populus is getting more important for well-comprehended plant science. Development of bioresorce serving functional genomics is making rapid progress. Huge efforts have achieved deposits of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) in various plant species consequently accelerating functional analysis of genes. ESTs from full-length cDNA clones are especially powerful for accurate molecular annotation. We promoted collection and annotation of the ESTs from Populus full-length enriched cDNA clones as part of functional genomics of tree species.

resultsWe have been collecting the full-length enriched cDNA of the female poplar (Populus nigra var. italica) for years. By sequencing P. nigra full-length (PnFL) cDNA libraries, we generated about 116,000 5'-end or 3'-end ESTs corresponding to 19,841 nonredundant PnFL clones. Population of PnFL cDNA clones represents 44% of the predicted genes in the Populus genome.

conclusionOur resource of P. nigra full-length enriched clones is expected to provide valuable tools to gain further insight into genome annotation and functional genomics in Populus.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAlgorithmsChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantCloning, MolecularCluster AnalysisDNA, ComplementaryGene LibraryGenes, PlantGenome, PlantPopulusSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Complementary

Identifiers

PMID18053163
PMCPMC2222646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.