Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18052603›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2007

When do HIV-infected women disclose their HIV status to their male partner and why? A study in a PMTCT programme, Abidjan.

Hermann Brou, Gérard Djohan, Renaud Becquet, Gérard Allou, Didier K Ekouevi, Ida Viho, Valériane Leroy, Annabel Desgrées-du-Loû, ANRS 1201/1202/1253 Ditrame Plus Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Determinants of disclosure and non-disclosure of HIV-positive status, by pregnant women in rural South Africa.SAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hermann BrouLaboratoire Population Environnement Développement, Institut de recherche pour le développement, Nogent-sur-Marne, France.
Gérard Djohan
Renaud Becquet
Gérard Allou
Didier K Ekouevi
Ida Viho
Valériane Leroy
Annabel Desgrées-du-Loû
ANRS 1201/1202/1253 Ditrame Plus Study Group
École Nationale Supérieure de Statistique et d'Économie Appliquée · CIProgramme PAC-CI · CIBordeaux Population Health · FRInserm · FRLaboratoire Population Environnement Développement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Africa, women tested for HIV during antenatal care are counselled to share with their partner their HIV test result and to encourage partners to undertake HIV testing. We investigate, among women tested for HIV within a prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) programme, the key moments for disclosure of their own HIV status to their partner and the impact on partner HIV testing. METHODS AND

findingsWithin the Ditrame Plus PMTCT project in Abidjan, 546 HIV-positive and 393 HIV-negative women were tested during pregnancy and followed-up for two years after delivery. Circumstances, frequency, and determinants of disclosure to the male partner were estimated according to HIV status. The determinants of partner HIV testing were identified according to women's HIV status. During the two-year follow-up, disclosure to the partner was reported by 96.7% of the HIV-negative women, compared to 46.2% of HIV-positive women (chi(2) = 265.2, degrees of freedom [df] = 1, p < 0.001). Among HIV-infected women, privileged circumstances for disclosure were just before delivery, during early weaning (at 4 mo to prevent HIV postnatal transmission), or upon resumption of sexual activity. Formula feeding by HIV-infected women increased the probability of disclosure (adjusted odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.27, Wald test = 4.649, df = 1, p = 0.031), whereas household factors such as having a co-spouse or living with family reduced the probability of disclosure. The proportion of male partners tested for HIV was 23.1% among HIV-positive women and 14.8% among HIV-negative women (chi(2) = 10.04, df = 1, p = 0.002). Partners of HIV-positive women who were informed of their wife's HIV status were more likely to undertake HIV testing than those not informed (37.7% versus 10.5%, chi(2) = 56.36, df = 1, p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn PMTCT programmes, specific psychosocial counselling and support should be provided to women during the key moments of disclosure of HIV status to their partners (end of pregnancy, weaning, and resumption of sexual activity). This support could contribute to improving women's adherence to the advice given to prevent postnatal and sexual HIV transmission.

Indexed as

CounselingPrenatal DiagnosisSexual PartnersTruth DisclosureAdultCote d'IvoireDecision MakingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID18052603
PMCPMC2100145
OpenAlexW2152085670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.