ReviewPaediatric drugs2007
Management of community-acquired pneumonia in children.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Disease Progression of Severe Pneumonia in a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in 1500 hospitalized children.Journal of medical virology · 2018Article
- Evaluation of Drug Treatment of Bronchopneumonia at the Pediatric Clinic in Sarajevo.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2016Article
- Evidence for short duration of antibiotic treatment for non-severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children - are we there yet? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2014Review
- Article
- Severe childhood respiratory viral infections.Advances in pediatrics · 2009Review
- Management of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults: Limitations of current antibiotics and future therapies.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a significant cause of childhood morbidity and mortality worldwide. Viral etiology is most common in young children and decreases with age. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the single most common bacterial cause across all age groups. Atypical organisms present similarly across all age groups and may be more common than previously recognized.A bacterial pneumonia should be considered in children presenting with fever >38.5 degrees C, tachypnea, and chest recession. Oxygen therapy is life saving and should be given when oxygen saturation is <92%. For non-severe pneumonia, oral amoxicillin is the antibacterial of choice with low failure rates reported. Severely ill children are traditionally treated with parenteral antibacterials. Penicillin non-susceptible S. pneumoniae prevalence rates are increasing and have been linked to community antibacterial prescribing. Most pneumococci remain sensitive to high-dose penicillin-based antibacterials but macrolide resistance is also a problem in some communities. However, primary combination treatment with macrolides is indicated in areas where there is a high prevalence of atypical organisms. The most common complications in CAP are parapneumonic effusions and empyema. The use of ultrasonography combined with intercostal drainage augmented with the use of fibrinolytic therapy has significantly reduced the morbidity associated with these complications. There is increasing evidence that a preventative strategy with the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-7) results in a significant fall in CAP in early childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.