Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18048633›Full record

Trial reportTobacco control2007

The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of telephone counselling and the nicotine patch in a state tobacco quitline.

Jack F Hollis, Timothy A McAfee, Jeffrey L Fellows, Susan M Zbikowski, Michael Stark, Karen Riedlinger

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tobacco control, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02440321 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

The Third Year Project of The Associated Factors of Smoking Around School-aged Children and The Intervention Development Using the Theory of Reasoned Action

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaipei Medical UniversityRan2011 to 2012Enrolled150ConditionsEnvironmental Tobacco SmokeArmsParent-child interactive program, written materials
NCT04620915 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

High-level Construal as a Novel Pathway for Affect Regulation and Cancer Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OregonRan2021 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsSmoking Cessation, Smoking Reduction, CancerArmsHigh-level construal, Down-regulation of craving for cigarettes, Up-regulation of goal energization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Cost-effectiveness of enhancing a Quit-and-Win smoking cessation program for college students.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jack F HollisCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR 97227, USA. Jack.Hollis@kpchr.org
Timothy A McAfee
Jeffrey L Fellows
Susan M Zbikowski
Michael Stark
Karen Riedlinger

Funding

EFFICACY AND COST OF STATE QUITLINE POLICIESR01CA086242 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HOLLIS, JACK F · 2000 to 2003
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA086242NCI NIH HHS R01 CA86242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesState and national tobacco quitlines have expanded rapidly and offer a range of services. We examined the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of offering callers single session versus multisession counselling, with or without free nicotine patches.

methodsThis 3x2 randomised trial included 4614 Oregon tobacco quitline callers and compared brief (one 15-minute call), moderate (one 30-minute call and a follow-up call) and intensive (five proactive calls) intervention protocols, with or without offers of free nicotine patches (nicotine replacement therapy, NRT). Blinded staff assessed tobacco use by phone at 12 months.

resultsAbstinence odds ratios were significant for moderate (OR = 1.22, CI = 1.01 to 1.48) and intensive (OR = 1.29, CI = 1.07 to 1.56) intervention, and for NRT (OR = 1.58, CI = 1.35 to 1.85). Intent to treat quit rates were as follows: brief no NRT (12%); brief NRT (17%); moderate no NRT (14%); moderate NRT (20%); intensive no NRT (14%); and intensive NRT (21%). Relative to brief no NRT, the added costs for each additional quit was $2467 for brief NRT, $1912 for moderate no NRT, $2109 for moderate NRT, $2641 for intensive no NRT, and $2112 for intensive NRT.

conclusionOffering free NRT and multisession telephone support within a state tobacco quitline led to higher quit rates, and similar costs per incremental quit, than less intensive protocols.

Indexed as

AdultCombined Modality TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisCounselingDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Care CostsHotlinesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotineOregonPatient SelectionSingle-Blind MethodSmoking CessationNicotine

Identifiers

PMID18048633
PMCPMC2598511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.