Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18047690›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2007

Pigs taking wing with transposons and recombinases.

Karl J Clark, Daniel F Carlson, Scott C Fahrenkrug

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Genome editing and genetic engineering in livestock for advancing agricultural and biomedical applications.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Review
  5. DNA Transposition at Work.Chemical reviews · 2016
    Review
  6. Engineered Swine Models of Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2016
    Review
  7. Genome edited sheep and cattle.Transgenic research · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Efficient nonmeiotic allele introgression in livestock using custom endonucleases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karl J ClarkDepartment of Animal Science at the University of Minnesota, Fitch Ave, St, Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Daniel F Carlson
Scott C Fahrenkrug

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swine production has been an important part of our lives since the late Mesolithic or early Neolithic periods, and ranks number one in world meat production. Pig production also contributes to high-value-added medical markets in the form of pharmaceuticals, heart valves, and surgical materials. Genetic engineering, including the addition of exogenous genetic material or manipulation of the endogenous genome, holds great promise for changing pig phenotypes for agricultural and medical applications. Although the first transgenic pigs were described in 1985, poor survival of manipulated embryos; inefficiencies in the integration, transmission, and expression of transgenes; and expensive husbandry costs have impeded the widespread application of pig genetic engineering. Sequencing of the pig genome and advances in reproductive technologies have rejuvenated efforts to apply transgenesis to swine. Pigs provide a compelling new resource for the directed production of pharmaceutical proteins and the provision of cells, vascular grafts, and organs for xenotransplantation. Additionally, given remarkable similarities in the physiology and size of people and pigs, swine will increasingly provide large animal models of human disease where rodent models are insufficient. We review the challenges facing pig transgenesis and discuss the utility of transposases and recombinases for enhancing the success and sophistication of pig genetic engineering. 'The paradise of my fancy is one where pigs have wings.' (GK Chesterton).

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyDNA Transposable ElementsGene Transfer TechniquesGenomeRecombinasesSwineDNA Transposable ElementsRecombinases

Identifiers

PMID18047690
PMCPMC2106845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.