Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18047643›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2007

Does training family physicians in shared decision making promote optimal use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections? Study protocol of a pilot clustered randomised controlled trial.

France Légaré, Michel Labrecque, Annie Leblanc, Robert Thivierge, Gaston Godin, Claudine Laurier, Luc Côté, Annette M O'Connor, Nadine Allain-Boulé, Jean Rousseau and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00354315 (DÉCISION+, a Continuous Professional Development Program to Improve Optimal Drug Prescription), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00354315 nacompletednot on this map

DÉCISION+, a Continuous Professional Development Program to Improve Optimal Drug Prescription : a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2006 to 2008Enrolled642ConditionsChoice BehaviorArmsContinuous medical education (CME)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Delayed antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Training family physicians in shared decision making for the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections: a pilot clustered randomized controlled trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

France LégaréResearch Centre of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca
Michel Labrecque
Annie Leblanc
Robert Thivierge
Gaston Godin
Claudine Laurier
Luc Côté
Annette M O'Connor
Nadine Allain-Boulé
Jean Rousseau
Sylvie Tapp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn North America, although it varies according to the specific type of acute respiratory infections (ARI), use of antibiotics is estimated to be well above the expected prevalence of bacterial infections. The objective of this pilot clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the feasibility of a larger clustered RCT aiming at evaluating the impact of DECISION+, a continuing professional development (CPD) program in shared decision making, on the optimal use of antibiotics in the context of ARI. METHODS/

designThis pilot study is a cluster RCT conducted with family physicians from Family Medicine Groups (FMG) in the Quebec City area, Canada. Participating FMG are randomised to an immediate DECISION+ group, a CPD program in shared decision making, (experimental group), or a delayed DECISION+ group (control group). Data collection involves recruiting five patients consulting for ARI per physician from both study groups before (Phase 1) and after (Phase 2) exposure of the experimental group to the DECISION+ program, and after exposure of the control group to the DECISION+ program (Phase 3). The primary outcome measures to assess the feasibility of a larger RCT include: 1) proportion of contacted FMG that agree to participate; 2) proportion of recruited physicians who participate in the DECISION+ program; 3) level of satisfaction of physicians regarding DECISION+; and 4) proportion of missing data in each data collection phase. Levels of agreement of the patient-physician dyad on the Decisional Conflict Scale and physicians' prescription profile for ARI are performed as secondary outcome measures. DISCUSSION: This study protocol is informative for researchers and clinicians interested in designing and/or conducting clustered RCT with FMG regarding training of physicians in shared decision making.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00354315.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical ProtocolsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsEducation, Medical, ContinuingEvidence-Based MedicineFamily PracticeFemaleFeverGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProfessional-Patient RelationsQuebecAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID18047643
PMCPMC2234396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.