ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
Living environments and health at the local level: the case of three localities in the Québec city region.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-perspective approach for defining neighbourhood units in the context of a study on health inequalities in the Quebec City region.International journal of health geographics · 2007Review
- Exploring rural health inequalities at a local scale: the case of Portneuf, Québec.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publiqueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo arrive at a better understanding of the combined impact of social health determinants on health inequities a research project was carried out in three localities in the Québec city region. This paper aims to show how residents' health status and health determinants can be explored through various data sources and analytic perspectives, and how these can then be combined to create a more comprehensive picture of health status at the local level.
methodsA multidisciplinary approach was adopted. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used: information from databases entered into a geographic information system, telephone survey and face-to-face interviews with key informants, telephone surveys with representative samples of the population in each locality and in-depth interviews with citizens. The localities were subdivided into neighbourhood units to refine the analysis on local environment.
resultsThe results obtained in the locality of Saint-Louis, which displays the worst scores of the three localities, illustrate the research strategy's potential. Socio-economic and health indicators show that Saint-Louis is less well-off than the two other localities and that huge disparities among neighbourhoods are present within this locality. Results from the interviews with key informants, the telephone survey and interviews with citizens confirm this overall picture, raising many hypotheses about the various factors interacting to contribute to levels of health.
interpretationTwo main methodological conclusions can also be drawn from this study: that defining the appropriate spatial scale to study the impact of living environments is crucially important, and that a life course approach is essential to understanding how inequities develop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18047160PMC6976019What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.