Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18046510›Full record

ArticleGenetica2008

Mutation rate and genome reduction in endosymbiotic and free-living bacteria.

Gabriel A B Marais, Alexandra Calteau, Olivier Tenaillon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The microbiome: Composition and locations.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome Rearrangement Shapes Prochlorococcus Ecological Adaptation.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Comparative Genomic Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Mutator genomes decay, despite sustained fitness gains, in a long-term experiment with bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel A B MaraisUniversité de Lyon, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie évolutive, Villeurbanne Cedex, 69622, France.
Alexandra Calteau
Olivier Tenaillon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome reduction has been considered the hallmark of endosymbiotic bacteria, such as endocellular mutualists or obligatory pathogens until it was found exactly the same in several free-living bacteria. In endosymbiotic bacteria genome reduction is mainly attributed to degenerative processes due to small population size. These cannot affect the free-living bacteria with reduced genomes because they are known to have very large population sizes. It has been proposed that selection for simplification drove genome reduction in these free-living bacteria. For at least one of them (Prochlorococcus), genome reduction is associated with accelerated evolution and we suggest an alternative hypothesis based on increase in mutation rate as the primary cause of genome reduction in free-living bacteria.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialMutationEvolution, MolecularGenes, EssentialModels, GeneticProchlorococcusSymbiosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.