Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18045995›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2008

Conversion of a replication origin to a silencer through a pathway shared by a Forkhead transcription factor and an S phase cyclin.

Laurieann Casey, Erin E Patterson, Ulrika Müller, Catherine A Fox

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A new light on DNA replication from the inactive X chromosome.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Palmitoylation controls the dynamics of budding-yeast heterochromatin via the telomere-binding protein Rif1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurieann CaseyDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Erin E Patterson
Ulrika Müller
Catherine A Fox
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PERNA, NICOLE T · 1985 to 2023
$16.5M
Origin Recognition Complex at Transcriptional SilencersR01GM056890 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FOX, CATHERINE A · 1998 to 2020
$6.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5 T32 GM07133NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056890NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM56890NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silencing of the mating-type locus HMR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires DNA elements called silencers. To establish HMR silencing, the origin recognition complex binds the HMR-E silencer and recruits the silent information regulator (Sir)1 protein. Sir1 in turn helps establish silencing by stabilizing binding of the other Sir proteins, Sir2-4. However, silencing is semistable even in sir1Delta cells, indicating that SIR1-independent establishment mechanisms exist. Furthermore, the requirement for SIR1 in silencing a sensitized version of HMR can be bypassed by high-copy expression of FKH1 (FKH1(hc)), a conserved forkhead transcription factor, or by deletion of the S phase cyclin CLB5 (clb5Delta). FKH1(hc) caused only a modest increase in Fkh1 levels but effectively reestablished Sir2-4 chromatin at HMR as determined by Sir3-directed chromatin immunoprecipitation. In addition, FKH1(hc) prolonged the cell cycle in a manner distinct from deletion of its close paralogue FKH2, and it created a cell cycle phenotype more reminiscent to that caused by a clb5Delta. Unexpectedly, and in contrast to SIR1, both FKH1(hc) and clb5Delta established silencing at HMR using the replication origins, ARS1 or ARSH4, as complete substitutes for HMR-E (HMRDeltaE::ARS). HMRDeltaE::ARS1 was a robust origin in CLB5 cells. However, initiation by HMRDeltaE::ARS1 was reduced by clb5Delta or FKH1(hc), whereas ARS1 at its native locus was unaffected. The CLB5-sensitivity of HMRDeltaE::ARS1 did not result from formation of Sir2-4 chromatin because sir2Delta did not rescue origin firing in clb5Delta cells. These and other data supported a model in which FKH1 and CLB5 modulated Sir2-4 chromatin and late-origin firing through opposing regulation of a common pathway.

Indexed as

S PhaseCatalysisCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin BForkhead Transcription FactorsGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalGene SilencingGenotypeModels, BiologicalReplication OriginRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSilencer Elements, TranscriptionalSuppression, GeneticCell Cycle ProteinsCLB5 protein, S cerevisiaeCyclin BFkh1 protein, S cerevisiaeForkhead Transcription FactorsRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18045995
PMCPMC2230585
OpenAlexW2101512724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.