Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18045832›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2007

Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations.

Claus Lundegaard, Ole Lund, Can Kesmir, Søren Brunak, Morten Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning of antibody epitopes using positional permutation vectors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting epitopes for vaccine development using bioinformatics tools.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2022
    Review
  6. Engineering neoantigen vaccines to improve cancer personalized immunotherapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Determinants for Neoantigen Identification.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Poly(Lactic-Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Immunogenic peptide discovery in cancer genomes.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claus LundegaardCenter for biological sequence analysis, CBS, Kemitorvet 208, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark. lunde@cbs.dtu.dk
Ole Lund
Can Kesmir
Søren Brunak
Morten Nielsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationImmunological bioinformatics methods are applicable to a broad range of scientific areas. The specifics of how and where they might be implemented have recently been reviewed in the literature. However, the background and concerns for selecting between the different available methods have so far not been adequately covered. SUMMARY: Before using predictions systems, it is necessary to not only understand how the methods are constructed but also their strength and limitations. The prediction systems in humoral epitope discovery are still in their infancy, but have reached a reasonable level of predictive strength. In cellular immunology, MHC class I binding predictions are now very strong and cover most of the known HLA specificities. These systems work well for epitope discovery, and predictions of the MHC class I pathway have been further improved by integration with state-of-the-art prediction tools for proteasomal cleavage and TAP binding. By comparison, class II MHC binding predictions have not developed to a comparable accuracy level, but new tools have emerged that deliver significantly improved predictions not only in terms of accuracy, but also in MHC specificity coverage. Simulation systems and mathematical modeling are also now beginning to reach a level where these methods will be able to answer more complex immunological questions.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationEpitope MappingHumansImmunity, InnateImmunologic FactorsImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID18045832
PMCPMC7110254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.