Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18045238›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2008

EGF and amphiregulin differentially regulate Cbl recruitment to endosomes and EGF receptor fate.

Kathryn A Stern, Trenton L Place, Nancy L Lill

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. mBio · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EGF, TGF-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Amplification of Wild-typeClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn A SternDepartment of Pharmacology and the Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Trenton L Place
Nancy L Lill
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Institutional Training Program in Oral Health ResearchT32DE014678 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SQUIER, CHRISTOPHER · 2002 to 2011
$5.2M
Ligand-Specific Regulation of EGF Receptor SignalingR01CA109685 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LILL, NANCY LOUISE · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS 1 R01 CA109685-01A2NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109685NIDCR NIH HHS DE014678-03NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE014678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EGF-R [EGF (epidermal growth factor) receptor] ligands can promote or inhibit cell growth. The biological outcome of receptor activation is dictated, at least in part, by ligand-specified patterns of endocytic trafficking. EGF-R trafficking downstream of the ligands EGF and TGF-alpha (transforming growth factor-alpha) has been investigated extensively. However, less is known about EGF-R fates induced by the ligands BTC (betacellulin) and AR (amphiregulin). We undertook comparative analyses to identify ligand-specific molecular events that regulate EGF-R trafficking and degradation. EGF (17 nM) and BTC (8.5 nM) induced significant EGF-R degradation, with or without ectopic expression of the ubiquitin ligase Cbl. Human recombinant AR (17 nM) failed to affect receptor degradation in either case. Notably, levels of ligand-induced EGF-R ubiquitination did not correlate strictly with receptor degradation. Dose-response experiments revealed that AR at a saturating concentration was a partial agonist at the EGF-R, with approx. 40% efficacy (relative to EGF) at inducing receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, ubiquitination and association with Cbl. EGF-R down-regulation and degradation also were compromised upon cell stimulation with AR (136 nM). These outcomes correlated with decreased degradation of the Cbl substrate and internalization inhibitor hSprouty2. Downstream of the hSprouty2 checkpoint in AR-stimulated cells, Cbl-free EGF-R was incorporated into endosomes from which Cbl-EGF-R complexes were excluded. Our results suggest that the AR-specific EGF-R fate results from decreased hSprouty2 degradation and reduced Cbl recruitment to underphosphorylated EGF-R, two effects that impair EGF-R trafficking to lysosomes.

Indexed as

AmphiregulinAnimalsBase SequenceCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsDNA PrimersDown-RegulationEGF Family of ProteinsEndosomesEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGlycoproteinsHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsAmphiregulinAREG protein, humanCBL protein, humanDNA PrimersEGF Family of ProteinsEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsGlycoproteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-cblUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID18045238
PMCPMC3507514
OpenAlexW2018670085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.