ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2008
Quality assessment of treated tannery wastewater with special emphasis on pathogenic E. coli detection through serotyping.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multispecies microcosm to assess the effect of footwear wastes on soil biota: a contribution towards sustainability.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal variations in the composition of algal mats in wastewater treatment ponds of tannery industry.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- Article
- Recovery of laccase-producing gammaproteobacteria from wastewater.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019Article
- Assessment of the Physicochemical Qualities and Prevalence of Escherichia coli and Vibrios in the Final Effluents of Two Wastewater Treatment Plants in South Africa: Ecological and Public Health Implications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to assess the quality of treated tannery effluent discharged from Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP), Unnao, India, to various water bodies and agricultural lands. The physico-chemical analyses revealed that the effluent was yellowish-brown in colour, having alkaline pH, high BOD, COD values and contained large quantities of organic and inorganic constituents well above the prescribed standards. The bacteriological quality was assessed in terms of the presence of heterotrophs and total as well as faecal coliforms. All faecal coliforms were identified as Escherichia coli, of which 50% were found pathogenic after serotyping. Most of the serotypes were uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) 04. The potential risks of the contamination of different ecosystems situated to the vicinity of such sites are obvious. The observations of this investigation indicate that the treated tannery effluent released for various purposes is not satisfactory, and is far from optimal in attaining the safe limits of disposal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18044007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.