Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18043983›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2008

The dilemma of disclosure: patient perspectives on gay and lesbian providers.

Rita S Lee, Trisha V Melhado, Karen M Chacko, Kelly J White, Amy G Huebschmann, Lori A Crane

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Confronting the Scope of LGBT Inequity in Surgery.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rita S LeeDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Rita.Lee@uchsc.edu
Trisha V Melhado
Karen M Chacko
Kelly J White
Amy G Huebschmann
Lori A Crane
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscrimination toward gay and lesbian patients by health care providers has been documented. No study has determined if patient behavior would change when seeing a gay/lesbian provider.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to examine whether a provider's sexual orientation would affect the choice of provider, practice, or preference for a chaperone during genital exams.

designThe design of the study was an anonymous, cross-sectional survey.

participantsThe participants were a random national sample of persons 18 years or older residing in the USA able to read English. MEASUREMENTS: The measurements were self-reported perceptions and chaperone preference based on provider gender and sexual orientation.

resultsThe response rate was 32% (n = 502). Many respondents indicated they would change providers upon finding out their provider was gay/lesbian (30.4%) or change practices if gay/lesbian providers were employed there (35.4%). Female respondents preferred chaperones most with heterosexual male providers (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.95) followed by homosexual male (OR 1.17, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.47), lesbian (reference), and heterosexual female providers (OR 0.63, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.77). Male respondents showed an increased preference for chaperones with gay/lesbian providers of either gender (OR 1.52, 95%, CI = 1.22 to 1.90, for gay male provider, [reference] for lesbian provider) than with either heterosexual male (OR 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.52) or heterosexual female providers (OR 0.39, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.54).

conclusionsPatients may change providers, practices, or desire for chaperone based on a provider's gender and sexual orientation. Although the low response rate may limit generalizability, these findings have the potential to impact aspects of practice structure including chaperone use and provider-patient relationships.

Indexed as

DisclosurePrejudiceProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHomosexuality, FemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPublic OpinionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18043983
PMCPMC2359168
OpenAlexW2052427000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.