ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2008
The dilemma of disclosure: patient perspectives on gay and lesbian providers.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Between reluctance and resistance: LGBTQ+ healthcare professionals and their experiences in the workplace.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Dissectionality of Care in the U.S.: A Scoping Review in Healthcare of Implicit Bias, Perceived Discrimination, and Minority Stress Among Sexual and Gender Minorities.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Review of current 2SLGBTQIA+ inequities in the Canadian health care system.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Confronting the Scope of LGBT Inequity in Surgery.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2022Article
- Prevalence of Discrimination, Abuse, and Harassment in Emergency Medicine Residency Training in the US.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Academic Emergency Medicine Faculty Experiences with Racial and Sexual Orientation Discrimination.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- The Health Challenges of Emerging Adult Gay Men: Effecting Change in Health Care.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2020Review
- Physician Workforce Disparities and Patient Care: A Narrative Review.Health equity · 2019Review
- Article
- A Qualitative Exploration of Facilitators for Health Service Use among Aging Gay Men Living with HIV.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiscrimination toward gay and lesbian patients by health care providers has been documented. No study has determined if patient behavior would change when seeing a gay/lesbian provider.
objectiveThe objective of the study was to examine whether a provider's sexual orientation would affect the choice of provider, practice, or preference for a chaperone during genital exams.
designThe design of the study was an anonymous, cross-sectional survey.
participantsThe participants were a random national sample of persons 18 years or older residing in the USA able to read English. MEASUREMENTS: The measurements were self-reported perceptions and chaperone preference based on provider gender and sexual orientation.
resultsThe response rate was 32% (n = 502). Many respondents indicated they would change providers upon finding out their provider was gay/lesbian (30.4%) or change practices if gay/lesbian providers were employed there (35.4%). Female respondents preferred chaperones most with heterosexual male providers (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.95) followed by homosexual male (OR 1.17, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.47), lesbian (reference), and heterosexual female providers (OR 0.63, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.77). Male respondents showed an increased preference for chaperones with gay/lesbian providers of either gender (OR 1.52, 95%, CI = 1.22 to 1.90, for gay male provider, [reference] for lesbian provider) than with either heterosexual male (OR 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.52) or heterosexual female providers (OR 0.39, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.54).
conclusionsPatients may change providers, practices, or desire for chaperone based on a provider's gender and sexual orientation. Although the low response rate may limit generalizability, these findings have the potential to impact aspects of practice structure including chaperone use and provider-patient relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.