Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18043950›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2008

Family physicians' perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes regarding information sharing with prostate cancer patients throughout the course of the disease.

Orit Cohen Castel, Lea Ungar, Mordechai Alperin, Gilad E Amiel, Khaled Karkabi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Primary care physicians and oncologists are partners in cancer announcement.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  3. National survey addressing the information needs of primary care physicians: Side effect management of patients on androgen deprivation therapy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2014
    Article
  4. Urologists' attitudes regarding information sharing with prostate cancer patients--is there a common ground for collaboration with family physicians?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Orit Cohen CastelDepartment of Family Medicine, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, 6, Hashahaf Street, Haifa, 35013, Israel. ocastel@zahav.net.il
Lea Ungar
Mordechai Alperin
Gilad E Amiel
Khaled Karkabi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to describe family physicians' perceptions regarding the concerns of men with prostate cancer as well as their beliefs and attitudes toward information sharing and decision making with prostate cancer patients throughout the course of their disease. MATERIALS AND

methodsA questionnaire (44 items) was mailed to 780 board-certified family physicians registered in the 2003 computerized database of Clalit Health Services, Israel's largest health maintenance organization.

resultsThree hundred eighty-two (50%) physicians completed the questionnaires. Overall, respondents believed that patients have substantial concerns throughout the cancer trajectory and that the most troubling issue is the fear of disease progression. There were no significant differences in the amount of information physicians were willing to share with patients throughout the course of the disease. Sixty-four percent of respondents stated that they would tailor the information to the patients' wishes and characteristics. Seventy percent felt competent at breaking bad news and 74% would discuss emotions with patients. Fifty-five percent of respondents preferred that patients be autonomous in their decision making.

conclusionsFamily physicians in Israel are aware of patients' concerns and recognize the importance of sharing information with prostate cancer patients. Further studies are needed to examine the practice of these attitudes and to verify whether they are compatible with patients' expectations in the relevant cultural and ethnic context.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePhysician-Patient RelationsSocial PerceptionTruth DisclosureAccess to InformationCommunicationDecision MakingDisease ProgressionHealth Care SurveysHumansIsraelMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, FamilyPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.