Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18043911›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2008

Inhibition of metoprolol metabolism and potentiation of its effects by paroxetine in routinely treated patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Ksenia Goryachkina, Aleksandra Burbello, Svetlana Boldueva, Svetlana Babak, Ulf Bergman, Leif Bertilsson

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of theFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ksenia GoryachkinaCourse of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Hospital Therapy, St. Petersburg I.I. Mechnikov State Medical Academy, Piskarevsky Prospect, 47, 195 067 St Petersburg, Russia. ksenia_goryachkina@yahoo.com
Aleksandra Burbello
Svetlana Boldueva
Svetlana Babak
Ulf Bergman
Leif Bertilsson
Karolinska Institutet · SESt. Petersburg State Medical Academy "City Hospital No. 26" · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the influence of paroxetine on metoprolol concentrations and its effect in patients treated for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are routinely given paroxetine as a co-treatment of depression.

methodsWe recruited 17 depressed AMI patients who received metoprolol as a routine part of their therapy (mean dose 75 +/- 39 mg/day). Patients were genotyped for CYP2D6 3, 4 and gene duplication. Metoprolol and alpha-hydroxy-metoprolol were analyzed in plasma 0, 2, 6 and 12 h post-dose. Heart rates (HR) at rest were registered after each sampling. Paroxetine 20 mg daily was then administered, and all measurements were repeated on day 8.

resultsAll patients were genotypically extensive metabolizers (EMs) (nine with 1/1 and eight with 1/3 or 4). Following the administration of paroxetine, mean metoprolol areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased (1064 +/- 1213 to 4476 +/- 2821 nM x h/mg per kg, P = 0.0001), while metabolite AUCs decreased (1492 +/- 872 to 348 +/- 279 n M x h/mg per kg, P < 0.0001), with an increase of metabolic ratios (MR) (0.9 +/- 1.3 to 26 +/- 29; P < 0.0001). Mean HRs were significantly lower after the study week at each time point. Mean area under the HR versus time curve (AUEC) decreased (835 +/- 88 to 728 +/- 84 beats x h/min; P = 0.0007). Metoprolol AUCs correlated with patients' AUECs at the baseline (Spearman r = -0.64, P < 0.01), but not on the eighth day of the study. A reduction of metoprolol dose was required in two patients due to excessive bradycardia and severe orthostatic hypotension. No other adverse effects of the drugs were identified.

conclusionA pronounced inhibition of metoprolol metabolism by paroxetine was observed in AMI patients, but without serious adverse effects. We suggest, however, that the metoprolol dose is controlled upon initiation and withdrawal of paroxetine.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationArea Under CurveBradycardiaCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6DepressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsFemaleGenotypeHeart RateHumansHypotension, OrthostaticMaleAdrenergic beta-Antagonistsalpha-hydroxymetoprololAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6MetoprololParoxetine

Identifiers

PMID18043911
OpenAlexW2018080987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.