Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18043702›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2009

Does early enteral feeding of very low birth weight infants increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis?

F Cakmak Celik, C Aygun, E Cetinoglu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F Cakmak CelikDepartment of Pediatrics, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.
C Aygun
E Cetinoglu
Ondokuz Mayıs University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveIn this retrospective study, we intended to test whether early enteral feeding (EEF) of very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm babies increases the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or not. SUBJECTS AND

methodsOverall, 297 VLBW preterm babies admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between April 2003 and April 2006 were included. The study consisted of two periods: the first period was between April 2003 and October 2004, when babies were not fed enterally until they were extubated (167 preterm VLBWs). The second period was between November 2004 and April 2006, when babies were fed even when they were intubated, starting preferably on the first day of life (130 preterm VLBWs). Criteria for withholding enteral feeding in both periods were hypotension necessitating vasopressor agent use, abdominal distention, abdominal tenderness and suspected or proven NEC. Possible risk factors for NEC were also recorded.

resultsThe overall incidence of NEC in VLBW preterm babies was 6.7% and did not differ between the two study periods: 7.2% in the late and 6.2% in the EEF regimens. On logistic regression analysis, the most important risk factors associated with NEC were sepsis (P<0.001) and blood culture positivity (P<0.001). The average daily weight gain was significantly higher in the early fed babies (P=0.011).

conclusionsThe EEF of VLBW preterm babies does not increase the risk of NEC. Increased daily weight gain is an important reason to feed these babies earlier.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightBloodEnteral NutritionEnterocolitis, NecrotizingHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLogistic ModelsRetrospective StudiesRiskSepsisWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID18043702
OpenAlexW2037289993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.