ReviewJournal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology2007
Facilitating compound progression of antiretroviral agents via modeling and simulation.
Review in Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploiting Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Methods for Optimizing and Accelerating Drug Development of Innovative Anti-Infectives.ChemMedChem · 2026Review
- Antiretroviral pharmacology in mucosal tissues.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2013Review
- A sensitive and rapid liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of the novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant in rhesus macaque plasma, and cerebral spinal fluid, and human plasma with application in translational NeuroAIDs research.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2009Article
- The role of quantitative pharmacology in an academic translational research environment.The AAPS journal · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmacotherapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients and the development of safe and effective antiretroviral dosing regimens has been hindered by numerous issues, including the rapid development of viral resistance to drug therapy, the narrow therapeutic window of the drug compounds, and lack of fundamental knowledge concerning the sources of variation in exposure and response to antiretroviral agents. Sources of variation may include factors such as interpatient differences in genetic expression, immunological response, pathogenesis, epidemiologic and socioeconomic factors, and demographics. Modeling and simulation (M&S) techniques have become valuable tools to identify and quantify variability in exposure and response to antiretroviral agents throughout the drug development process. Before actual entry into human safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) trials, in vitro screening and in vivo pharmacology studies conducted to assess compound potency and compatibility with agents included in acceptable antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens can be characterized via quantitative relationships. In addition, physiochemical data is initially used to screen drug candidates based on favorable PK and biopharmaceutic properties. Compound progression can likewise be supported with M&S exercises to ensure the traceability of key assumptions and decisions. The underlying techniques utilize nonlinear mixed effect modeling, Monte Carlo simulation, Neural networks, several regression-based approaches, and less computationally intensive techniques. The application of such an approach promises to be an essential component in the development of new agents to treat HIV-1 and is being implemented in the context of evaluating Nk1r antagonists as potential candidates to treat NeuroAIDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.