Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18040801›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology2006

Effects of opioid tolerance and withdrawal on the immune system.

Toby K Eisenstein, Rahil T Rahim, Pu Feng, Nita K Thingalaya, Joseph J Meissler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Kratom (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toby K EisensteinCenter for Substance Abuse Research and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Temple University School of Medicine, 3400 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA. tke@temple.edu
Rahil T Rahim
Pu Feng
Nita K Thingalaya
Joseph J Meissler
Temple University · US

Funding

Pilot Projects Core (PPC)P30DA013429 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Anjali M Rajadhyaksha · 2000 to 2026
$34.6M
OPIOIDS, OPIOID RECEPTORS, AND IMMUNE COMPETENCER01DA006650 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ADLER, MARTIN W · 1991 to 2012
$5.0M
Opioid Dependence, Immunity and InfectionR01DA014223 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI EISENSTEIN, TOBY K. · 2001 to 2005
$1.7M
OPIOIDS, OPIOID RECEPTORS, AND SEPSISR01DA011134 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI EISENSTEIN, TOBY K. · 1997 to 2001
$478k
NIDA NIH HHS DA06650NIDA NIH HHS DA11134NIDA NIH HHS DA13429NIDA NIH HHS DA14223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Review of the robust literature using acute drug injection paradigms points clearly to the conclusion that morphine is immunosuppressive. In contrast, studies of the effect of subacute or chronic administration of morphine on immune function is limited, with variable results. In some cases tolerance to the immunosuppressive effects of the drug is clearly demonstrated, but in other cases, selected immune parameters do not demonstrate tolerance. Discrepancies in findings may result from differences in species or route and manner of drug administration. Even fewer studies (total of 10) have been published on the effects of withdrawal on immune function. Most immune parameters tested are suppressed following drug withdrawal. Recovery time to baseline response levels varies in the studies. In the single report of withdrawal in humans, immune function was suppressed for up to 3 years. It is clearly established that withdrawal suppresses capacity of murine spleen cells to make an ex vivo antibody response, which contrasts with evidence of polarization of the lymphocytes towards a Th2 phenotype. Several laboratories have shown that subacute and chronic exposure to morphine, as well as drug withdrawal, sensitize to the lethal effects of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Underlying sepsis, combined with morphine-induced hypofunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, may be occult variables modulating immune responses during opioid administration and withdrawal. As episodes of withdrawal are common among drug abusers, more intensive investigation is warranted on the effects of withdrawal on immune function, on mechanisms of immune modulation, and on sensitization to infection.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsDrug ToleranceHumansImmune SystemMorphineNeuroimmunomodulationSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAnalgesics, OpioidMorphine

Identifiers

PMID18040801
OpenAlexW2088740195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.