ArticleExperimental brain research2008
Effects of medial olivocochlear efferent stimulation on the activity of neurons in the auditory midbrain.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Modeling the effects of medial olivocochlear efferent stimulation at the level of the inferior colliculus.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Local mechanisms for loud sound-enhanced aminoglycoside entry into outer hair cells.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015Article
- Efferent pathways modulate hyperactivity in inferior colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents are known to suppress spontaneous activity and sound-evoked responses of primary afferents by their actions on outer hair cells in the cochlea. This study investigated the effects of MOC activation on the responses of single neurons in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (CNIC) of anaesthetized guinea pigs. Extracellular responses of CNIC neurons to contralateral tones were recorded with and without MOC stimulation in normal animals and in animals acutely treated with gentamicin to eliminate peripheral effects of MOC activation. In normal animals, input-output functions of CNIC neurons showed a variety of changes. Some effects resembled qualitatively those reported for primary afferents. However, other effects were also observed, including an increase of firing rates at medium- to high-tone levels and in a small number of neurons (10%), an increase in spontaneous activity. In addition, larger threshold shifts and larger reductions of spontaneous firing rates were observed as compared to effects seen in the periphery. In gentamicin-treated animals, activation of MOC efferents did not produce any changes in the input-output functions or spontaneous activity of CNIC neurons. This observation is consistent with the majority of MOC-induced changes in monaural responses in the CNIC being mediated by the actions of MOC terminals in the cochlea and resulting from the interplay between altered afferent input and central circuitry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18040668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.