Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18037617›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2008

SIMAP--structuring the network of protein similarities.

Thomas Rattei, Patrick Tischler, Roland Arnold, Franz Hamberger, Jörg Krebs, Jan Krumsiek, Benedikt Wachinger, Volker Stümpflen, Werner Mewes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Signature protein of the PVC superphylum.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2014
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. B2G-FAR, a species-centered GO annotation repository.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PEDANT covers all complete RefSeq genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2009
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas RatteiChair of Genome Oriented Bioinformatics, Center of Life and Food Science, Technische Universität München, 85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
Patrick Tischler
Roland Arnold
Franz Hamberger
Jörg Krebs
Jan Krumsiek
Benedikt Wachinger
Volker Stümpflen
Werner Mewes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein sequences are the most important source of evolutionary and functional information for new proteins. In order to facilitate the computationally intensive tasks of sequence analysis, the Similarity Matrix of Proteins (SIMAP) database aims to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date dataset of the pre-calculated sequence similarity matrix and sequence-based features like InterPro domains for all proteins contained in the major public sequence databases. As of September 2007, SIMAP covers approximately 17 million proteins and more than 6 million non-redundant sequences and provides a complete annotation based on InterPro 16. Novel features of SIMAP include a new, portlet-based web portal providing multiple, structured views on retrieved proteins and integration of protein clusters and a unique search method for similar domain architectures. Access to SIMAP is freely provided for academic use through the web portal for individuals at http://mips.gsf.de/simap/and through Web Services for programmatic access at http://mips.gsf.de/webservices/services/SimapService2.0?wsdl.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinInternetProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryUser-Computer InterfaceProteins

Identifiers

PMID18037617
PMCPMC2238827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.