Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18037163›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2008

Peptide- and collagen-based hydrogel substrates for in vitro culture of chick cochleae.

Nathaniel J Spencer, Douglas A Cotanche, Catherine M Klapperich

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Protein-engineered hydrogel encapsulation for 3-D culture of murine cochlea.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. In vitro culture of mammalian inner ear hair cells.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathaniel J SpencerLaboratory for Cellular and Molecular Hearing Research, Department of Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. nspencer@bu.edu
Douglas A Cotanche
Catherine M Klapperich
Boston Children's Hospital · USBoston University · US

Funding

CELL FORM AND GENE EXPRESSION IN HAIR CELL REGENERATIONR01DC001689 · NIDCD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI COTANCHE, DOUGLAS A · 1992 to 2009
$3.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overall goal of this work is to improve the culture of the auditory organ of birds for the dual use of developing a hair cell regeneration model and charting a pathway to the eventual replacement of the hearing organ. In doing so, we develop a protocol for removing the auditory organ from its basement membrane in the inner ear, attach the organ to a series of artificial basement membranes, and conduct qualitative and quantitative analysis of how cell morphology, viability and function change with time. Native matrix cultures, where the epithelium was floating in media with the basement membrane and accessory structures attached, were used as a basis of comparison. PuraMatrix, collagen I, collagen I/chondroitin-sulfate and Matrigel were chosen to encompass a diverse range of mechanical properties and macromolecule moieties. Surprisingly, we find that PuraMatrix outperformed the other matrices as a scaffold for sensory organ culture. PuraMatrix a self-assembled peptide hydrogel, is a biochemically specific culture substrate that contains none of the extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules and growth factors contained in the inner ear's basement membrane. Rheological measurements reveal that PuraMatrix may be a closer approximation to the stiffness of the soft tissue supporting the auditory organ. Cell density on the PuraMatrix substrate is comparable to that of the native matrix cultures, despite the absence of the basement membrane and accessory structures. Further studies show that PuraMatrix supports the culture of functional hair cells over a 72 h period, with a significant increase in the number of functional hair cells in comparison to the organ cultured without a matrix. This is the first example of adhesion of the adult auditory epithelium to a biomaterial for an extended period of time. With further optimization, this system will enable the performance of many novel biophysical and pharmacological studies involving hair cells and supporting cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell CountCell SurvivalChickensChondroitin SulfatesCochleaCollagenDrug CombinationsElasticityEpithelial CellsEpitheliumExtracellular MatrixHair Cells, AuditoryHydrogelsBiocompatible MaterialsChondroitin SulfatesCollagenDrug CombinationsFM1 43HydrogelsLamininmatrigelPeptidesProteoglycansPyridinium CompoundsQuaternary Ammonium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID18037163
PMCPMC2424202
OpenAlexW2088343788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.