Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18036698›Full record

ReviewVirus research2008

Adenovirus vector induced innate immune responses: impact upon efficacy and toxicity in gene therapy and vaccine applications.

Zachary C Hartman, Daniel M Appledorn, Andrea Amalfitano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virus research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 237 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Four decades of adenovirus gene transfer vectors: History and current use.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Adenovirus as a Vector and Oncolytic Virus.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Enhanced Biosafety of theBiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary C HartmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Daniel M Appledorn
Andrea Amalfitano
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

RNA TRASFECTED DENDRITIC CELLS FOR CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPYP01CA078673 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MORSE, MICHAEL A · 1999 to 2008
$13.2M
Adenovirus vectors and complement systemR01DK069884 · NIDDK · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI AMALFITANO, ANDREA NA · 2005 to 2007
$775k
NCI NIH HHS CA078673NCI NIH HHS P01 CA078673NIDDK NIH HHS DK069884NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensively characterized, modified, and employed for a variety of purposes, adenovirus (Ad) vectors are generally regarded as having great potential by many applied virologists who wish to manipulate and use viral biology to achieve beneficial clinical outcomes. Despite widespread functional prominence and utility (i.e., Ad-based clinical trials have begun to progress to critical Phase III levels, it has recently become apparent that investigations regarding the innate immune response to Ads may reveal not only reasons behind previous failures, but also reveal novel insights that will allow for safer, more efficacious uses of this important gene transfer platform. Insights gained by the exploration of Ad induced innate immune responses will likely be most important to the fields of vaccine development, since Ad-based vaccines are regarded as one of the more promising vaccine platforms in development today. Adenovirus is currently known to interact with several different extracellular, intracellular, and membrane-bound innate immune sensing systems. Past and recent studies involving manipulation of the Ad infectious cycle as well as use of different mutants have shed light on some of the initiation mechanisms underlying Ad induced immune responses. More recent studies using microarray-based analyses, genetically modified cell lines and/or mouse mutants, and advanced generation Ad vectors have revealed important new insights into the scope and mechanism of this cellular defensive response. This review is an attempt to synthesize these studies, update Ad biologists to the current knowledge surrounding these increasingly important issues, as well as highlight areas where future research should be directed. It should also serve as a sobering reality to researchers exploring the use of any gene transfer vector, as to the complexities potentially involved when contemplating use of such vectors for human applications.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyAdenoviridaeAnimalsGenetic VectorsHumansImmunity, InnateMiceReceptors, VirusViral VaccinesReceptors, VirusViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID18036698
PMCPMC4039020
OpenAlexW2075338937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.