Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18035564›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2008

Congenital cataracts and their molecular genetics.

J Fielding Hejtmancik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 211 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
211citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

211 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sensitive periods for the functional specialization of the neural system for human face processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Case Report: Identification of aFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Human congenital cataract mutation inInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Through theGenes · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

151 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J Fielding HejtmancikMOGS/OGVFB/NEI/NIH, Building 10, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. f3h@helix.nih.gov

Funding

INHERITED OCULAR DISEASESZ01EY000272 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI HEJTMANCIK, JAMES F. · 1991 to 2008
$4.8M
Clinical/molecular Study In Congenital/Heredity CataractZ01EY000281 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI HEJTMANCIK, JAMES F. · 1993 to 2008
$1.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 EY000272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cataract can be defined as any opacity of the crystalline lens. Congenital cataract is particularly serious because it has the potential for inhibiting visual development, resulting in permanent blindness. Inherited cataracts represent a major contribution to congenital cataracts, especially in developed countries. While cataract represents a common end stage of mutations in a potentially large number of genes acting through varied mechanisms in practice most inherited cataracts have been associated with a subgroup of genes encoding proteins of particular importance for the maintenance of lens transparency and homeostasis. The increasing availability of more detailed information about these proteins and their functions and is making it possible to understand the pathophysiology of cataracts and the biology of the lens in general.

Indexed as

AnimalsCataractChromosome MappingChromosomes, HumanConnexinsCorneaCrystallinsHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsIntermediate Filament ProteinsLens, CrystallineMembrane ProteinsModels, BiologicalMutationRefraction, OcularTranscription FactorsConnexinsCrystallinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsIntermediate Filament ProteinsMembrane ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18035564
PMCPMC2288487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.