ReviewHNO2008
[Regenerative medicine in head and neck reconstructive surgery].
Review in HNO, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Pathogenesis of chronic wounds].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2008Review
- [Regenerative medicine. New therapeutic methods in otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery].HNO · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous transplantation is regarded as the gold standard in the treatment of congenital or acquired deformities. However, the availability of autologous tissue for transplantation is often limited. Regenerative medicine aims to activate individuals' own intrinsic regenerative mechanisms and embraces tissue engineering, cell/system biology, gene therapy and stem-cell biology. Most approaches in tissue engineering are based on the expansion of small autologous cell aggregates. Tissue engineering supplemented by isolated and amplified stem cells is another very promising option for producing autologous transplants and getting over the limited availability. The association of stem cell-based tissue engineering and gene therapy allows the creation of regenerative tissue in the optimal ambience of regulatory proteins. This leads to great opportunities in the transplantation of skin, bones or cartilage. This paper presents the current status and the possible benefits, but also the limitations, of regenerative medicine in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18034220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.