Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18033795›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2008

Improved recognition of figures containing fluorescence microscope images in online journal articles using graphical models.

Yuntao Qian, Robert F Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mining biomedical images towards valuable information retrieval in biomedical and life sciences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Finding and accessing diagrams in biomedical publications.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2012
    Article
  5. Automatic figure classification in bioscience literature.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2011
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hierarchical image classification in the bioscience literature.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuntao QianCenter for Bioimage Informatics and Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
Robert F Murphy

Funding

Nation Center- Integrative Biomedical Informatics(RMI)U54DA021519 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATHEY, BRIAN DAVID · 2005 to 2010
$21.3M
FLUORESCENT PROBES &IMAGING FOR NETWORKS &PATHWAY(RMI)U54RR022241 · NCRR · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI WAGGONER, ALAN S. · 2005 to 2011
$19.9M
Probabilistic Modeling of Information from Images/TextR01GM078622 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, ROBERT F · 2006 to 2008
$777k
NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR022241NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA021519NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078622NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078622-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThere is extensive interest in automating the collection, organization and analysis of biological data. Data in the form of images in online literature present special challenges for such efforts. The first steps in understanding the contents of a figure are decomposing it into panels and determining the type of each panel. In biological literature, panel types include many kinds of images collected by different techniques, such as photographs of gels or images from microscopes. We have previously described the SLIF system (http://slif.cbi.cmu.edu) that identifies panels containing fluorescence microscope images among figures in online journal articles as a prelude to further analysis of the subcellular patterns in such images. This system contains a pretrained classifier that uses image features to assign a type (class) to each separate panel. However, the types of panels in a figure are often correlated, so that we can consider the class of a panel to be dependent not only on its own features but also on the types of the other panels in a figure.

resultsIn this article, we introduce the use of a type of probabilistic graphical model, a factor graph, to represent the structured information about the images in a figure, and permit more robust and accurate inference about their types. We obtain significant improvement over results for considering panels separately. AVAILABILITY: The code and data used for the experiments described here are available from http://murphylab.web.cmu.edu/software.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInternetMicroscopy, FluorescencePublishing

Identifiers

PMID18033795
PMCPMC2901545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.