ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2007
Antifungal management in cancer patients.
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- New insights on the development of fungal vaccines: from immunity to recent challenges.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2015Review
- Pain Management for Children during Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Transplantation.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2015Article
- Chinese herbal medicine for myelosuppression induced by chemotherapy or radiotherapy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2015Review
- Posaconazole in the management of refractory invasive fungal infections.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy. Established risk factors are previous fungal infection, neutropenia exceeding 10 days, older age, active cancer, corticosteroid therapy, administration of broad spectrum antibiotics, allogeneic HSCT, central venous catheter and organ dysfunction. The strategies to manage IFI comprise chemoprophylaxis, preemptive, empirical and directed antifungal therapy. Benefit of antifungal prophylaxis has been proven for fluconazole (400 mg/d) in allogeneic transplant recipients, and for posaconazole (600 mg/d) in patients during AML/MDS induction chemotherapy as well as in patients with GvHD. Pre-emptive therapy based on sensitive diagnostic non-culture methods needs further validation in larger randomized studies before becoming a standard. Empirical antifungal therapy is well established and should consist of either liposomal amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, or caspofungin. In patients with documented invasive aspergillosis, therapy with voriconazole is the treatment of choice. Liposomal amphotericin B is a good alternative candidate and caspofungin is reserved for salvage treatment. Invasive candidiasis should be treated with caspofungin or one of the lipid based amphotericin B formulations. Since non-albicans species are increasingly observed, the use of fluconazole is reserved for "stable", non-neutropenic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18030555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.