ArticleJournal of molecular biology2007
Impact of DNA hairpin folding energetics on antibody-ssDNA association.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting residues involved in anti-DNA autoantibodies with limited neural networks.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- The Combining Sites of Anti-lipid A Antibodies Reveal a Widely Utilized Motif Specific for Negatively Charged Groups.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Deposition of anti-DNA antibodies in the kidney contributes to the pathogenesis of the autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus. Antibodies that bind to hairpin-forming DNA ligands may be particularly prone to deposition. Here we report the first structure of a Fab complexed with hairpin-forming DNA. The ligand used for co-crystallization is 5'-d [CTG(CCTT)CAG]-3', which has a predicted hairpin structure consisting of a four-nucleotide loop (CCTT) and a stem of three base-pairs. The 1.95 A resolution crystal structure of Fab DNA-1 complexed with this ligand shows that the conformation of the bound ligand differs radically from the predicted hairpin conformation. The three base-pairs in the stem are absent in the bound form. The protein binds to the last six nucleotides at the 3' end of the ligand. These nucleotides form a loop (TTCA) closed by a G:C base-pair in the bound state. Stacking of aromatic side-chains against DNA bases is the dominant interaction in the complex. Interactions with the DNA backbone are conspicuously absent. Thermodynamics of binding are examined using isothermal titration calorimetry. The apparent dissociation constant is 4 microM, and binding is enthalpically favorable and entropically unfavorable. Increasing the number of base-pairs in the DNA stem from three to six decreases binding affinity. These data suggest a conformational selection binding mechanism in which the Fab binds preferentially to the unstructured state of the ligand. In this interpretation, the ligand binding and ligand folding equilibria are coupled, with lower hairpin stability leading to greater effective binding affinity. Thus, pre-organization of the DNA loop into the preferred binding conformation does not play a major role in complexation. Rather, it is argued that the stem of the hairpin serves to reduce the degrees of freedom in the free DNA ligand, thereby limiting the entropic cost attendant to complexation with the Fab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.