ArticleBMC genomics2007
e-Fungi: a data resource for comparative analysis of fungal genomes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unravelling azole resistance in fungal pathogens: molecular mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic strategies.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Diversity of soil fungi from sacred groves of Kerala, India revealed by comparative metagenomics analysis using illumina sequencing.3 Biotech · 2024Article
- Trends and Applications of Omics Technologies to Functional Characterisation of Enzymes and Protein Metabolites Produced by Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Identification of 15 candidate structured noncoding RNA motifs in fungi by comparative genomics.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Comparative metagenomics approaches to characterize the soil fungal communities of western coastal region, Saudi Arabia.PloS one · 2017Article
- The Pathogen-Host Interactions database (PHI-base): additions and future developments.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Utilization of multiple "omics" studies in microbial pathogeny for microbiology insights.Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine · 2013Review
- Fungal pathogenicity genes in the age of 'omics'.Molecular plant pathology · 2011Review
- The Comprehensive Phytopathogen Genomics Resource: a web-based resource for data-mining plant pathogen genomes.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2011Article
- Article
- Genomic resources of Magnaporthe oryzae (GROMO): a comprehensive and integrated database on rice blast fungus.BMC genomics · 2009Article
- Fungal functional genomics: tunable knockout-knock-in expression and tagging strategies.Eukaryotic cell · 2009Article
- SNUGB: a versatile genome browser supporting comparative and functional fungal genomics.BMC genomics · 2008Article
- FUNYBASE: a FUNgal phYlogenomic dataBASE.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
- Comparative genome analysis of filamentous fungi reveals gene family expansions associated with fungal pathogenesis.PloS one · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe number of sequenced fungal genomes is ever increasing, with about 200 genomes already fully sequenced or in progress. Only a small percentage of those genomes have been comprehensively studied, for example using techniques from functional genomics. Comparative analysis has proven to be a useful strategy for enhancing our understanding of evolutionary biology and of the less well understood genomes. However, the data required for these analyses tends to be distributed in various heterogeneous data sources, making systematic comparative studies a cumbersome task. Furthermore, comparative analyses benefit from close integration of derived data sets that cluster genes or organisms in a way that eases the expression of requests that clarify points of similarity or difference between species. DESCRIPTION: To support systematic comparative analyses of fungal genomes we have developed the e-Fungi database, which integrates a variety of data for more than 30 fungal genomes. Publicly available genome data, functional annotations, and pathway information has been integrated into a single data repository and complemented with results of comparative analyses, such as MCL and OrthoMCL cluster analysis, and predictions of signaling proteins and the sub-cellular localisation of proteins. To access the data, a library of analysis tasks is available through a web interface. The analysis tasks are motivated by recent comparative genomics studies, and aim to support the study of evolutionary biology as well as community efforts for improving the annotation of genomes. Web services for each query are also available, enabling the tasks to be incorporated into workflows.
conclusionThe e-Fungi database provides fungal biologists with a resource for comparative studies of a large range of fungal genomes. Its analysis library supports the comparative study of genome data, functional annotation, and results of large scale analyses over all the genomes stored in the database. The database is accessible at http://www.e-fungi.org.uk, as is the WSDL for the web services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.