Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18027989›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2007

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients: a study by the EORTC-PAMM-NDDG.

Markus Joerger, Alwin D R Huitema, Dick J Richel, Christian Dittrich, Nikolas Pavlidis, Evangelos Briasoulis, Jan B Vermorken, Elena Strocchi, Andrea Martoni, Roberto Sorio and 13 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exposure-Toxicity Association of Cyclophosphamide and Its Metabolites in Infants and Young Children with Primary Brain Tumors: Implications for Dosing.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.

Markus JoergerDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. markus.joerger@kssg.ch
Alwin D R Huitema
Dick J Richel
Christian Dittrich
Nikolas Pavlidis
Evangelos Briasoulis
Jan B Vermorken
Elena Strocchi
Andrea Martoni
Roberto Sorio
Henk P Sleeboom
Miguel A Izquierdo
Duncan I Jodrell
Régine Féty
Ernst de Bruijn
Georg Hempel
Mats Karlsson
Brigitte Tranchand
Ad H G J Schrijvers
Chris Twelves
Jos H Beijnen
Jan H M Schellens
EORTC-PAMM-NDDG
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Hospital of Ioannina · GRAntwerp University Hospital · BEBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBCentre Léon Bérard · FREuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitut Génétique Nantes Atlantique · FRIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention · ATMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLSlotervaartziekenhuis · NLUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Münster · DEUppsala University · SEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsSixty-five female patients with early or advanced breast cancer received doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) over 15 minutes followed by cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) over 15 minutes. The plasma concentration-time data of both drugs were measured, and the relationship between drug pharmacokinetics and neutrophil counts was evaluated using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling. Relationships were explored between drug exposure (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]), toxicity and tumour response.

resultsFifty-nine patients had complete pharmacokinetic and toxicity data. In 50 patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 60%, with complete responses in 6% of patients. Both doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics were associated with neutrophil toxicity. Cyclophosphamide exposure (the AUC) was significantly higher in patients with at least stable disease (n = 44) than in patients with progressive disease (n = 6; 945 micromol . h/L [95% CI 889, 1001] vs 602 micromol . h/L [95% CI 379, 825], p = 0.0002). No such correlation was found for doxorubicin. Body surface area was positively correlated with doxorubicin clearance; AST and patient age were negatively correlated with doxorubicin clearance; creatinine clearance was positively correlated with doxorubicinol clearance; and occasional concurrent use of carbamazepine was positively correlated with cyclophosphamide clearance.

conclusionsThe proposed inhibitory population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model adequately described individual neutrophil counts after administration of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. In this patient population, exposure to cyclophosphamide, as assessed by the AUC, might have been a predictor of the treatment response, whereas exposure to doxorubicin was not. A prospective study should validate cyclophosphamide exposure as a predictive marker for the treatment response and clinical outcome in this patient group.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingArea Under CurveBreast NeoplasmsCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFemaleHematologic DiseasesHumansMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalTreatment OutcomeAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCyclophosphamideDoxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID18027989
OpenAlexW1991487627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.