ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2009
Biochemical correlates of lipoprotein(a) in a general adult population. Possible implications for cardiovascular risk assessment.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiological association between migraine and lipoprotein(a): a systematic review.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2015Pooled it
- New Therapeutic Approaches to the Treatment of Dyslipidemia 2: LDL-C and Lp(a).Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2023Review
- Genetic association of cardiovascular disease related biomarkers with the overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma: a Mendelian randomization analysis.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Incidence of elevated lipoprotein (a) levels in a large cohort of patients with cardiovascular disease.Clinical research in cardiology supplements · 2017Article
- Objective assessment of health or pre-chronic disease state based on a health test index derived from routinely measured clinical laboratory parameters.Journal of translational medicine · 2015Article
- Quantitatively plotting the human face for multivariate data visualisation illustrated by health assessments using laboratory parameters.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence has been provided that lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) may be an important cardiovascular risk factor. Recognition of potential Lp(a) variability associated with common diseases, such as diabetes, chronic renal dysfunction, impaired liver function and acute/chronic inflammation, is important to optimize the clinical usefulness of this measurement.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis on our Laboratory Information System to retrieve results of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), creatinine, albumin, high sensitivity-C reactive protein (Hs-CRP) and Lp(a) tests, which were performed on all outpatients referred by general practitioners for routine blood testing during the last 5 years.
resultsCumulative results for all of the above parameters were retrieved for 1,195 adults. After stratifying Lp(a) results according to the respective threshold values of albumin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR), FPG and Hs-CRP, a significant difference was observed only among subjects with increased Hs-CRP levels (170 mg/l vs. 125 mg/l; P < 0.001). The frequency of Lp(a) values > or =300 mg/l was greater in those with increased Hs-CRP levels (36 vs. 26%; P = 0.037)-but not in those with abnormal values of albumin, e-GFR or FPG-compared with their counterparts with normal values of these parameters. In multiple regression analysis, age (r = 0.112; P < 0.001), Hs-CRP (r = 0.102; P = 0.001) and e-GFR (r = 0.106; P = 0.003) were independent predictors of Lp(a).
conclusionsThe evaluation of laboratory markers of glucose homeostasis and liver function seems unnecessary when measuring Lp(a) for cardiovascular risk assessment. Conversely, Hs-CRP and probably GFR might be of clinical value to identify individuals whose serum Lp(a) levels can be transiently or chronically increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.