Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18027034›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2008

Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity.

Vimal K Narula, Jeffrey W Hazey, David B Renton, Kevin M Reavis, Christopher M Paul, Kristen E Hinshaw, Bradley J Needleman, Dean J Mikami, E Christopher Ellison, W Scott Melvin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00427752 (Diagnostic Transluminal Endoscopic Peritoneoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00427752 early_phase1completednot on this map

Diagnostic Transluminal Endoscopic Peritoneoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJeffrey HazeyRan2006 to 2012Enrolled20ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsTransgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery as a novel partial gastrectomy technique.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2014
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vimal K NarulaDivision of General Surgery, The Ohio State University School of Medicine and Public Health, 410 West 10th Avenue, Ohio, Columbus, 43210-1228, USA. vknarula1@yahoo.com
Jeffrey W Hazey
David B Renton
Kevin M Reavis
Christopher M Paul
Kristen E Hinshaw
Bradley J Needleman
Dean J Mikami
E Christopher Ellison
W Scott Melvin
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a rapidly evolving technique providing access to the peritoneum utilizing an endoscope via a natural orifice. One of the most significant requirements of this technique is the need to minimize the risk of clinically significant peritoneal contamination. We report the bacterial load and contamination of the peritoneal cavity in patients requiring a gastrotomy Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LSRYGB).

methodsWe prospectively studied 50 patients undergoing a gastrotomy with creation of a gastrojejunostomy during LSRYGB. We recorded the patient's proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) utilization preoperatively and sampled gastric contents without lavage. We also sampled peritoneal fluid prior to and after gastrotomy, noting the length of time the gastrotomy was open to the peritoneum. Each of the three samples was sent for bacterial colony counts, and culture with identification of species.

resultsFifty patients underwent LSRYGB with a mean operative time of 93 min. The gastrotomy was open to the peritoneal cavity for an average of 18 min. Seventeen of 50 patients were on PPIs preoperatively, resulting in a significant difference in postgastrostomy peritoneal bacterial counts. The average number of colony-forming units (CFU) of the gastric aspirate was 22,303 CFU/ml. Peritoneal aspirates obtained for examination prior to creation of a gastrotomy showed no CFUs in 44 of 50 patients. Peritoneal sampling after gastrotomy showed contamination of the abdomen with an average of 1102 CFU/ml. There was no correlation between the bacterial load in the stomach and peritoneal load after gastrotomy. No infectious complications or leaks developed. One complication of rhabdomyolysis in a patient with no peritoneal bacterial contamination developed.

conclusionsTransgastric instrumentation does contaminate the abdominal cavity but pathogens are clinically insignificant due to species or bacterial load. Patients on PPIs do have an increased bacterial load in the gastric aspirate, with no clinical significant infection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAnastomosis, Roux-en-YBacterial InfectionsConfidence IntervalsEquipment ContaminationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastric BypassGastroscopesGastroscopyHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMale

Identifiers

PMID18027034
OpenAlexW2150420876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.